In one of winter evenings we gathered for the city. Dinner, at first cheerful, like any feast that unites true friends, was overshadowed at the end by the story of one doctor, who in the morning ascertained a violent death. One of the local farmers, whom we all considered an honest and sane person, killed his wife in a fit of jealousy. After the impatient questions that always arise in tragic incidents, after explanations and interpretations, as usual, discussions began on the details of the case, and I was surprised to hear how it aroused disputes between people who in many other cases agreed in views, feelings and principles.

One said that the killer acted in full consciousness, being sure that he was right; another argued that a mild-tempered person could only be dealt with in this way under the influence of a momentary insanity. The third shrugged his shoulders, finding it base to kill a woman, no matter how guilty she was, while his interlocutor considered it low to leave her alive after an obvious infidelity. I will not pass on to you all the contradictory theories that arose and were discussed about the eternally insoluble question: the moral right of a husband to a criminal wife from the point of view of law, society, religion and philosophy. All this was discussed with fervour, and, not seeing eye to eye, began the argument again. Someone remarked, laughing, that honor would not prevent him from killing even such a wife, about whom he did not care at all, and made the following original remark:

Make a law, he said, that would oblige a deceived husband to cut off in public the head of his criminal wife, and I bet that every one of you, who now speaks of himself implacable, will rebel against such a law.

One of us did not take part in the dispute. It was Mr. Sylvester, a very poor old man, kind, courteous, with a sensitive heart, an optimist, a modest neighbor, at whom we laughed a little, but whom we all loved for his good-natured character. This old man was married and had a beautiful daughter. His wife died, having squandered a huge fortune; daughter did even worse. Trying in vain to wrest her from her depravity, Monsieur Sylvester, being fifty years old, provided her with his surviving last means to deprive her of a pretext for vile speculation, but she neglected this sacrifice, which he considered necessary to make her for his own honor. He went to Switzerland, where he lived under the name of Sylvester for ten years, completely forgotten by those who knew him in France. He was later found near Paris, in a country house, where he lived remarkably modestly, spending three hundred francs of his annual income, the fruits of his labor and savings abroad. Finally, he was persuaded to spend the winter with Mr. and Mrs. ***, who especially loved and respected him, but he became so passionately attached to solitude that he returned to it as soon as the buds appeared on the trees. He was an ardent hermit and was known as an atheist, but in fact he was a very religious person who created a religion for himself of his own accord and adhered to the philosophy that is spread a little everywhere. In a word, despite the attention that his family showed him, the old man was not distinguished by a particularly high and brilliant mind, but he was noble and sympathetic, with serious, sensible and firm views. He was compelled to express his own opinion, after having refused for a long time under the pretext of incompetence in this matter, he admitted that he had been married twice and both times unhappy in family life. He did not say anything more about himself, but, wanting to get rid of the curious, he said the following:

Of course, adultery is a crime because it breaks an oath. I find this crime equally serious for both sexes, but both for one and for the other in some case, which I will not tell you, there is no way to avoid it. Let me be a casuist about strict morality and call adultery only adultery, not caused by the one who is its victim, and premeditated by the one who commits it. In this case, the unfaithful spouse deserves punishment, but what punishment will you apply when the one who believes it, unfortunately, is himself a responsible person. There must be a different solution for both one and the other side.

Which? shouted from all sides. - You are very inventive if you found it!

Maybe I haven't found it yet, - Mr. Sylvester replied modestly, - but I have been looking for it for a long time.

Tell me what do you think is the best?

I always wished and tried to find the punishment that would act on morality.

What is this separation?

Contempt?

Even less.

Hatred?

Everyone looked at each other; some laughed, others were perplexed.

I seem mad or stupid to you,” Mr. Sylvester remarked calmly. “Well, friendship used as a punishment can affect the morals of those who can repent… It's too long to explain: it's already ten o'clock, and I don't want to disturb my masters. I ask permission to leave.

He did as he said, and there was no way to keep him. No one paid much attention to his words. We thought that he got out of difficulties by saying a paradox, or, like an ancient sphinx, wanting to disguise his impotence, asked us a riddle that he himself did not understand. I understood Sylvester's riddle later. It is very simple, and I will even say that it is extremely simple and possible, but meanwhile, in order to explain it, he had to go into details that seemed instructive and interesting to me. A month later, I wrote down what he told me in the presence of Mr. and Mrs. ***. I do not know how I earned his trust and got the opportunity to be among his closest listeners. Perhaps I became especially sympathetic to him as a result of my desire, without a preconceived goal, to know his opinion. Perhaps he felt the need to pour out his soul and hand over into some faithful hands those seeds of experience and charity that he had acquired through the hardships of his life. But be that as it may, and whatever in itself this confession may be, that is all that I could recall from the narration heard over the course of long hours. This is not a novel, but rather a report of analyzed events, presented patiently and conscientiously. From a literary point of view, it is uninteresting, not poetic, and affects only the moral and philosophical side of the reader. I ask his forgiveness for not treating him this time to a more scientific and refined meal. The narrator, whose goal is not to show his talent, but to express his thought, is like a botanist who brings not rare plants from a winter walk, but grass that he was lucky to find. This blade of grass delights neither the eye, nor the smell, nor the taste, but meanwhile, one who loves nature appreciates it and will find material for study in it. M. Sylvester's story may seem dull and devoid of embellishment, but nevertheless his listeners liked it for its frankness and simplicity; I even know that sometimes he seemed dramatic and beautiful to me. Listening to him, I always remembered the wonderful definition of Renan, who said that the word is "a simple garment of thought and all its elegance lies in complete harmony with the idea that can be expressed." In the case of art, "everything should serve beauty, but what is deliberately used for decoration is bad."

I think that Mr. Sylvester was filled with this truth, because he managed to capture our attention during his simple story. Unfortunately, I am not a stenographer and I convey his words as best I can, trying to carefully follow the thoughts and actions, and therefore I irretrievably lose their peculiarity and originality.

He began in a rather casual tone, almost lively, for, despite the blows of fate, his character remained cheerful. Perhaps he did not expect to tell us his story in detail and thought to bypass those facts that he considered unnecessary for proof. As his story progressed, he began to think differently, or else, carried away by truthfulness and recollection, he decided not to cross out or soften anything.

George Sand

George Sand made a great contribution to the development of French literature. She led the women's emancipation movement.

The real name of the writer is Amandine Aurora Lyon Dupin. She was born in the family of the famous Marshal Moritz of Saxony. Aurora lost her father early and remained dependent on her eccentric mother and grandmother. The atmosphere in the family was far from romantic: the grandmother often made scandals, reproached Aurora's mother for being of low birth and behaving rather obscenely before marriage. The girl invariably took the side of her mother, tried to support her in everything.

Aurora's family life began when she was 18 years old. Her husband was a young artillery lieutenant Casimir Dudevan, the illegitimate son of a baron, deprived of his fortune since childhood. Nevertheless, the groom's father still allocated a certain amount for the wedding. Aurora had an estate that she inherited from her grandmother.

The discrepancy between the financial situation of the spouses quickly led to their complete break. From this marriage, Aurora had two children: a son, who was named Moritz in honor of the eminent marshal, and a daughter, Solange. Aurora made every effort to make family life more enjoyable, despite financial difficulties: she sewed clothes for children, cooked and took care of the household herself. Unfortunately, this was not enough, then she began to translate, and a little later she began to write a novel. As a result of dissatisfaction with her work, Aurora threw the first creation into the fire.

In the end, the young woman was forced to move to Paris with her young daughter. Here she settled in an old house in the attic.

In order to reduce spending on women's outfits, Aurora began to wear men's suits, the convenience of which also consisted in the fact that they could be worn in any weather. The young woman put on a long gray coat, a round felt hat, high boots and set off to wander around the city, absolutely happy and content with her freedom. Sometimes her husband came to visit her, then they went to the theater or dined at some expensive restaurant. In the summer, Aurora and her daughter took vacations and lived for several months in Nohant. These months were filled with excruciating pain in Aurora's heart, because it was here that her beloved son lived.

Meetings with her mother-in-law did not bring much joy to Aurora. A wayward and demanding woman has always been against literary creativity daughter-in-law, moreover, she forbade the writer to publish her books under the name Dudevant, and Aurora took the pseudonym George Sand. Already in the spring of 1832, her first novel, Indiana, was published, which was enthusiastically received not only by readers, but also by critics.

Among her contemporaries, George Sand was known as an immoral person, she was considered a lesbian, at least bisexual, and it was repeatedly noted that the writer did not fully realize her maternal instinct, which was expressed in the search for men much younger than her. George Sand had a sharp manner. Her extraordinary intellect and passionate thirst for life invariably attracted men.

It is generally accepted that George Sand's first love was the young writer Jules Sando. Nevertheless, according to the writer herself, she was in love long before meeting Sando. George Sand had pure platonic feelings for this man and used to sit up long after midnight over fiery messages to her lover. This mysterious man, whose name George Sand never revealed, did not want to be content with the Platonic "marriage of souls", so in the end the romantically inclined Aurora was forced to agree that he seek happiness with another woman.

George Sand never had sex unless she was sure she was in love with her partner. According to some lovers, she was frigid, but in reality she belonged to those women who become passionate only under the influence of feelings. Sand could also be passionate and sensual. For example, as the writer herself admitted, she adored the married, ugly Michel de Bourget, who made her "tremble with desire."

Aurora's third lover was Alfred de Musset, whom she dreamed of meeting for a long time. When Musset was at the height of his fame, George Sand had already released four novels that were very popular. Along with universal recognition, money also came to the writer.

From the first minute of meeting Alfred, George Sand was forced to admit that he looks great. He was 6 years younger than her, with a slim build and wavy blond hair. Musset could skillfully carry on small talk, decorating it with elegant turns.

Regarding the appearance of George Sand herself, her contemporaries do not have an unequivocal opinion. Some considered it disgusting, others - nondescript. However, Musset described George Sand in a completely different way: “When I saw her for the first time, she was in a woman's dress, and not in an elegant man's suit, with which she so often disfigured herself. And she also behaved with a truly feminine grace, inherited from her noble grandmother. Traces of youth still refreshed her cheeks, her magnificent eyes shone brightly, and this brilliance under the shadow of thick dark hair made a truly enchanting impression, striking me to the very heart. On the forehead lay the seal of infinity thoughts. She spoke little, but firmly.

After meeting George Sand, Musset often said that love for this woman turned his whole being upside down. Before meeting her, he had never experienced such an enthusiastic state, that euphoria that you feel in your youth.

Alfred de Musset did not immediately conquer Aurora. During the first date, she liked his graceful manner, his attitude towards her as a high society lady, despite the fact that Aurora eked out an almost beggarly existence at that time. George Sand was also flattered that famous poet asks her to evaluate his works.

The difference in characters did not appear immediately, and the lovers were happy at first. However, soon all the shortcomings of Musset came out. George Sand could not stand his constant hallucinations when he allegedly communicated with spirits. During quarrels, he accused his mistress of coldness and said that she should live in a monastery. Such reproaches especially hurt George Sand, who always believed in noble and sublime love.

A joint trip to Venice showed all the internal contradictions of their relationship. Musset abandoned creativity, and in order to provide the sophisticated lover with the comfort he needed, George Sand actively began to write. According to her confessions, Musset continued his dissolute life, as a result of which his health was greatly shaken. Doctors suspected he had brain inflammation or typhus. George Sand selflessly looked after her lover, ate almost nothing and spent sleepless nights near the patient. At this time, the young doctor Pagello appeared in her life. After the crisis had passed, the doctor did not leave the patient for a long time. One evening he received an envelope from the hands of George Sand. When asked who it was intended for, she wrote "stupid Pagello."

The contents of the envelope stunned the doctor. It contained a sheet with a whole list of questions: “Do you only want me or do you love me? Do you know what a spiritual desire is, which no caress can lull? etc. As Pagello later said, it was a witch's spell.

After recovering, Musset demanded an explanation, to which George Sand replied that from now on she could consider herself free, since before the illness he behaved in an obscene manner and himself spoke of a break. After that, George Sand and Pagello moved to Paris. The doctor felt like a stranger in this city, so he soon returned to his native Venice. Musset went to Baden, and George Sand went to heal her wounds at her estate.

The poet sent her passionate messages with the following content: “Oh, it’s scary to die, it’s scary to love like that. What a desire, my Georges, what a desire for you! I'm dying. Goodbye!". Nevertheless, the worst did not happen, and the poet who threatened to go to the forefathers returned to Paris, where the former lovers reunited again. And immediately followed by a series of mutual accusations and injections of jealousy. In the end, George Sand decided that it was time to stop the senseless war, and the lovers parted forever. Now they could completely free themselves from the heavy burden of memories by transferring them to a sheet of paper.

It is impossible not to mention the name of the great composer Chopin, who occupied a central place in the life of George Sand for 10 years. At first, the writer avoided his courtship in every possible way, since she believed that the brilliant composer was created only for music and passion and would soon get bored in the arms of such a frank lady as she was, but she was mistaken: George Sand was no longer able to extinguish the fire of desire that had arisen.

And that's how they met. One evening Chopin found himself at a reception with a certain Countess K. By the end of the reception, when most of the guests had already left, Chopin sat down at the piano and began to improvise. Soon he felt a look on him that seemed to be trying to penetrate into his soul. The composer raised his eyes and saw a simply dressed lady, from whom the scent of violets wafted. As he was getting ready to go home, a woman approached him and began to lavish praise on his brilliant performance. Chopin was pleased to hear the praises of such a famous writer, but he remained calm in his heart: outwardly he did not like her.

However, it would not have been George Sand if she had not managed to captivate him. It should be said that the writer never stood on ceremony with numerous lovers and was perfectly able to manage them. No one could resist her, not even her ill-wishers. There is no better proof of this than Chopin's love. His pure soul reached out to a woman who wore men's suits, smoked cigars and spoke freely.

The lovers settled in Mallorca, but history repeated itself: during the heyday of the novel, Musset fell ill, the same happened with Chopin. For the freedom-loving George Sand, who despised any weakness, life became unbearable, and she began to think about breaking up. However, it was quite difficult to do this, and even George Sand, experienced in such matters, began to doubt herself. Then she wrote a novel in which she is easily guessed, exalted to the status of a queen, and Chopin, endowed with all possible weaknesses. The end was inevitable, but the composer still hoped for a miracle.

About a year after the breakup, the former lovers met again. The repentant George Sand approached Chopin and held out her hand to him. Turning pale and without saying a word, he left the room. On this, of course, the list of novels of the writer did not end. Sand's lovers included the engraver Alexandre Damien Manso and the painter Charles Marshal.

Until now, the statement that the writer had intercourse with women seems doubtful. Letters to actress Marie Dorval have survived to this day, which clearly have an erotic connotation, but it should be borne in mind that at that time such an appeal to a friend was considered quite normal. In general, we can say that George Sand is an extraordinary, multifaceted personality, and no matter how many lovers she had, the main thing is that she left behind a wonderful literary heritage.

SAND GEORGES

Real name - Amandine Lucy Aurora Dupin

(born in 1804 - died in 1876)

The reputation of George Sand was scandalous. She wore men's clothing, smoked cigars, and spoke in a low male voice. Her pseudonym itself was male. It is believed that this is how she fought for the freedom of women. She was not beautiful and considered herself a freak, proving that she did not have that grace which, as is well known, sometimes replaces beauty. Contemporaries described her as a woman of short stature, dense build, with a gloomy expression, large eyes, absent-minded gaze, yellow skin, premature wrinkles on the neck. Only hands they recognized as unconditionally beautiful.

V. Efroimson, who devoted many years to the search for the biological prerequisites for giftedness, noted the paradoxical fact that prominent women often have a clearly defined male characterology. These are Elizabeth I Tudor, Christina of Sweden, and the writer George Sand. The researcher puts forward as a possible explanation for giftedness the presence of a hormonal imbalance of the adrenal cortex and increased secretion of androgens (and not only in women themselves, but also in their mothers).

V. Efroimson notes that if the excess of androgens in the mother falls on the critical phases of intrauterine development nervous system, and above all the brain, then there is a "reorientation" of the psyche in the male direction. Such prenatal hormonal exposure leads to the fact that girls grow up to be "tomboys", pugnacious, preferring boyish games to dolls.

Finally, he hypothesizes that George Sand's masculine behavior and tendencies - like those of Queen Elizabeth I Tudor - were the result of Morris syndrome, a type of pseudo-hermaphroditism. This anomaly is very rare - about 1:65,000 among women. Pseudo-hermaphroditism, writes V. Efroimson, “... could give rise to severe mental trauma, but the emotional stability of such patients, their love of life, diverse activity, energy, physical and mental, are simply amazing. For example, in terms of physical strength, speed, dexterity, they are so much superior to physiologically normal girls and women that girls and women with Morris syndrome are subject to exclusion from women's sports. With the rarity of the syndrome, it is found in almost 1% of outstanding athletes, that is, 600 times more often than one would expect if it did not stimulate exceptional physical and mental development. An analysis of many facts allowed V. Efroimson to suggest that the talented and brilliant George Sand was a representative of this rare type of woman.

George Sand was a contemporary and friend of both Dumas, Franz Liszt, Gustave Flaubert and Honore de Balzac. Her favor was sought by Alfred de Musset, Prosper Merimee, Frederic Chopin. They all highly appreciated her talent and what can be called charm. She was a child of her age, which became a century of trials for her native France.

Amandine Lucy Aurora Dupin was born in Paris on July 1, 1804. She was the great-granddaughter of the illustrious Marshal Moritz of Saxony. After the death of his beloved, he became friends with an actress, from whom he had a girl, who received the name Aurora. Subsequently, Aurora of Saxony (grandmother of George Sand), a young, beautiful and innocent girl, married the rich and depraved Earl of Hawthorne, who, fortunately for the young woman, was soon killed in a duel.

Then chance brought her to Dupin, an official from the Treasury. He was an amiable, elderly and somewhat old-fashioned gentleman, prone to clumsy gallantry. Despite his sixty years, he managed to win over a thirty-year-old beauty and enter into a marriage with her, which turned out to be very happy.

From this marriage, the son Moritz was born. During the turbulent days of the reign of Napoleon I, he fell in love with a woman of dubious behavior and secretly married her. Moritz, being an officer and receiving a meager salary, could not feed his wife and daughter, since he himself was dependent on his mother. Therefore, his daughter Aurora spent her childhood and youth on the estate of her grandmother Aurora-Marie Dupin in Nohant.

After the death of her father, she often had to witness scandals between her grandmother and mother. Aurora-Maria reproached the mother of the future writer with a low origin (she was either a dressmaker or a peasant woman), a frivolous relationship with the young Dupin before marriage. The girl took the side of her mother, and at night they often shed bitter tears together.

From the age of five, Aurora Dupin was taught French grammar, Latin, arithmetic, geography, history and botany. Madame Dupin vigilantly followed the mental and physical development of her granddaughter in the spirit of Rousseau's pedagogical ideas. The girl received further education in a monastery, as was customary in many aristocratic families.

Aurora spent about three years in the monastery. In January 1821, she lost her closest friend - Madame Dupin died, making her granddaughter the sole heiress of the Noan estate. A year later, Aurora met a young artillery lieutenant, Baron Casimir Dudevant, and agreed to become his wife. The marriage was doomed to fail.

The first years of marriage seemed happy. Aurora gave birth to a son Moritz and a daughter Solange, she wanted to devote herself completely to their upbringing. She sewed dresses for them, although she did not know how well, took care of the household and tried with all her might to make life in Nohant pleasant for her husband. Alas, she could not make ends meet, and this served as a source of constant reproaches and quarrels. Madame Dudevant took up translations, began to write a novel, which, due to many shortcomings, was thrown into the fireplace.

All this, of course, could not contribute to family happiness. Quarrels continued, and one fine day in 1831, the husband allowed his thirty-year-old wife to leave for Paris with Solange, where she settled in a room in the attic. To support herself and her child, she took up porcelain painting and sold her fragile work with varying degrees of success.

To get rid of the cost of expensive women's outfits, Aurora began to wear a men's suit, which was convenient for her because it made it possible to walk around the city in any weather. Wearing a long gray coat (fashionable at the time), a round felt hat and strong boots, she wandered the streets of Paris, happy with her freedom, which rewarded her for all hardships. She dined for one franc, washed and ironed the linen herself, took the girl for a walk.

When a husband came to Paris, he would certainly visit his wife and take her to the theater or some expensive restaurant. In the summer she returned to Nohant, chiefly to see her beloved son.

Her husband's stepmother also occasionally met her in Paris. Once she learned that Aurora intended to publish books, she was furious and demanded that Dudevant's name never appear on any cover. Aurora with a smile promised to fulfill her demand.

In Paris, Aurora Dudevant met Jules Sandeau. He was seven years younger than Aurora. He was a frail, fair-haired man of aristocratic appearance. Together with him, Aurora wrote her first novel, Rose and Blanche, and several short stories. But these were only the first steps on the difficult path of a writer; big life in French literature was still ahead and she had to pass it without Sando.

The triumphant entry into French literature was the novel "Indiana", published under the pseudonym George Sand (originally it was Jules Sand - a direct reference to the name of the former lover Jules Sando). The action of the novel begins in 1827 and ends at the end of 1831, when the July Revolution took place. The Bourbon dynasty, in the person of its last king, Charles X, has left the historical stage. The throne of France was occupied by Louis Philippe of Orleans, who during his eighteen-year reign did everything possible to protect the interests of the financial and industrial bourgeoisie. In "Indiana" the change of cabinets, the uprising in Paris and the flight of the king are mentioned, which gave the story a modern touch. At the same time, the plot is permeated with anti-monarchist motives, the author condemns the intervention of the French troops of Spain. This was new, as many Romantic writers in the 1830s were fascinated by the Middle Ages and did not address the topic of modernity at all.

The novel "Indiana" was greeted with approval and interest by both readers and critics. But, despite the recognition and growing popularity, contemporaries treated George Sand with hostility. They considered her frivolous (even easily accessible), fickle and heartless, they called her a lesbian or, at best, a bisexual, they pointed out that a deeply hidden maternal instinct was hidden in her, because Sand always chose men younger than herself.

In November 1832, George Sand published her new novel"Valentina". In it, the writer demonstrates remarkable skill, painting nature, and looks like a soulful psychologist who knows how to recreate the images of people of various classes.

It would seem that everything was going well: financial security, reader success, recognition of criticism. But it was at this time, in 1832, that George Sand was going through a deep depression (the first of many that followed), almost ending in suicide.

The emotional unrest and despair that gripped the writer arose due to government repression, which struck the imagination of everyone who was not immersed only in personal experiences. In The Story of My Life, George Sand acknowledged that her pessimism, her gloomy mood were generated by the absence of the slightest prospects: “My horizon expanded when all sorrows, all needs, all despair, all the vices of a great social environment appeared before me, when focus on my own destiny, but turned to the whole world, in which I was only an atom - then my personal longing spread to everything that exists, and the fatal law of fate appeared to me so terrible that my mind was shaken. In general, it was a time of general disappointment and decline. The republic that was dreamed of in July brought about an atoning sacrifice at the convent of Saint-Merry. Cholera mowed down the people. Saint-Simonism, which carried away the imagination with a swift stream, was struck down by persecution and ingloriously perished. It was then, seized with deep despondency, that I wrote Lelia.

The basis of the plot of the novel is the story of a young woman, Lelia, who, after several years of marriage, breaks with a man unworthy of her and, withdrawing in her grief, rejects social life. In love with her, Stenio, the young poet, like Lelia, is seized by the spirit of doubt, filled with indignation at the horrifying conditions of existence.

With the advent of Lelia, an image of a strong-willed woman appeared in French literature, rejecting love as a means of fleeting pleasure, a woman who overcomes many hardships before getting rid of the ailment of individualism, finding solace in useful activity. Lelia condemns the hypocrisy of high society, the dogmas of Catholicism.

According to George Sand, love, marriage, family can unite people, contribute to their true happiness; as long as the moral laws of society are in harmony with the natural inclinations of man. Controversy and noise arose around Lelia, readers saw this as a scandalous autobiography of the writer.

After reading Lelia, Alfred de Musset stated that he learned a lot about the author, although in essence he learned almost nothing about her. They met in the summer of 1833 at a reception hosted by the owner of the Revue des Deux Mondes magazine. At the table they were side by side, and this accidental proximity played a role not only in their fate, but also in French and world literature.

Musset was known as a Don Juan, a frivolous egoist, not devoid of sentimentality, an Epicurean. The aristocrat de Musset earned a reputation as the only man of the world among French romantics. The affair with Musset became one of the brightest pages in the life of the writer.

George Sand was six years older than Alfred. He was an insufferable prankster, drawing cartoons and writing funny rhymes in her scrapbook. They loved to play pranks. Once they gave a dinner, at which Musset was dressed in the costume of an eighteenth-century marquis, and George Sand in a dress of the same era, in tankins and flies. On another occasion, Musset dressed in the clothes of a Norman peasant woman and waited at the table. Nobody recognized him, and George Sand was delighted. Soon the lovers left for Italy.

According to her, Musset continued to lead the dissolute life in Venice that he had become accustomed to in Paris. However, his health deteriorated, doctors suspected inflammation of the brain or typhus. She fussed around the patient day and night, without undressing and hardly touching her food. And then a third character appeared on the scene - the twenty-six-year-old doctor Pietro Pagello.

The joint struggle for the life of the poet brought them so close that they guessed each other's thoughts. The disease was defeated, but for some reason the doctor did not leave the patient. Musset realized that he had become superfluous and left. Upon George Sand's return to France, they finally separated, but under the influence of Musset's former lover, he wrote the novel Confessions of a Son of the Century.

During her stay in Italy in 1834, being in another depression after the departure of Alfred de Musset, Sand wrote psychological novel"Jacques". It embodies the writer's dream of moral ideals, that love is a healing force that elevates a person, the creator of his happiness. But often love can be associated with betrayal and deceit. She thought about suicide again.

Evidence of this are the lines written in a letter to Pietro Pagello: “Since the day I fell in love with Alfred, every moment I play with death. In my desperation, I went as far as possible for human soul. But as soon as I feel the strength to desire happiness and love, I will also have the strength to rise.

And in her diary an entry appears: “I can no longer suffer from all this. And all this in vain! I am thirty years old, I am still beautiful, at least I will be beautiful in fifteen days, if I can force myself to stop crying. There are men around me who are worth more than me, but who, nevertheless, accept me for who I am, without lies and coquetry, who generously forgive me my mistakes and give me their support. Oh, if only I could force myself to love one of them! My God, give me back my strength, my energy, as it was in Venice. Give me back that fierce love of life, which has always been for me an outlet in a moment of the most terrible despair. Make me fall in love again! Oh, does it really amuse you to kill me, does it really give you pleasure to drink my tears! I... I don't want to die! I want to love! I want to be young again. I want to live!"

George Sand also wrote several wonderful short stories and novellas. Like many French novelists of the 19th century, she relied on the rich traditions of national literature, taking into account the experience of her predecessors and contemporaries. And contemporaries are Balzac, to whom she gave the plot for the novel "Beatrice, or Forced Love", Stendhal, Hugo and Nodier, Merimee and Musset.

In one of early stories"Melchior" (1832) writer, outlining life philosophy a young sailor, described the hardships of life, the absurd prejudices of society. It embodies Sand's typical theme of an unhappy marriage with tragic consequences. French critics compared the story "Marquis" with the best short stories by Stendhal and Merimee, found in it a special gift of a writer who managed to create a brief psychological study on the theme of fate, life and art. There is no complex intrigue in the story. The story is told from the perspective of the old marquise. The world of her memories revives the former feeling of platonic love for the actor Lelio, who played the main roles in the classic tragedies of Corneille and Racine.

The famous novel "????" (1838) adjoins the cycle of Venetian stories by George Sand - "Mattea", "The Last Aldini", the novels "Leone Leoni" and "Uskok", created during the writer's stay in Italy. The main motives of this fantastic story are based on real facts. The Venetian Republic, captured by the troops of General Bonaparte, was transferred to Austria in 1797, which began to mercilessly suppress the rights of the Venetians. The story tells about the ongoing struggle of patriots in Venice for the national revival of Italy. George Sand constantly showed deep respect for the courageous people of Italy, who aspired to create a single state. In later years, she devoted the novel Daniella to this topic.

In the thirties, George Sand met many prominent poets, scientists, and artists. She was greatly influenced by the ideas of the utopian socialist Pierre Leroux and the doctrine of Christian socialism by Abbé Lamennet. At that time, the theme of the French Revolution of the 18th century, which the writer embodied in her work, was widely reflected in literature. In the novel Maupra (1837), the action takes place in the pre-revolutionary period. The narrative is based on a psychological and moral moment, due to the author's belief in the ability to change, improve the natural features of human nature. The historical views of the author of the novel "Maupra" are very close to the views of Victor Hugo. The French Revolution of 1789-1794 was perceived by the Romantics as a natural embodiment of the idea of ​​development human society as its inexorable movement towards the future, illuminated by the light of political freedom and moral ideal. George Sand was of the same opinion.

The writer seriously studied the history of the French Revolution of 1789-1794, and read a number of studies about this era. Judgments about the positive role of the revolution in the progressive movement of mankind, the improvement of morals are organically included in the novel "Mopra" and subsequent ones - "Spiridion", "Countess Rudolyptadt". In a letter to L. Desage, she speaks positively of Robespierre and sharply condemns his Girondin opponents: “The people in the revolution were represented by the Jacobins. Robespierre - greatest man of the modern era: calm, incorruptible, prudent, inexorable in the struggle for the triumph of justice, virtuous ... Robespierre, the only representative of the people, the only friend of truth, the implacable enemy of tyranny, sincerely sought to ensure that the poor would cease to be poor, and the rich would cease to be rich.

In 1837, George Sand became close to Frederic Chopin. Gentle, fragile, feminine, imbued with reverence for everything pure, ideal, sublime, he unexpectedly fell in love with a woman who smoked tobacco, wore a man's suit and openly carried on frivolous conversations. When she became close to Chopin, Mallorca became their place of residence.

The scene is different, but the situation is the same, and even the roles turned out to be the same and the same sad ending. In Venice, Musset, lulled by the closeness of George Sand, skillfully rhymed beautiful words; in Majorca, Frederic created his ballads and preludes. Thanks to the dog George Sand, the famous "Dog Waltz" was born. Everything was fine, but when the composer had the first signs of consumption, George Sand began to be weary of him. Beauty, freshness, health - yes, but how to love a sick, frail, capricious and irritable person? George Sand thought so. She herself admitted this, trying, of course, to soften the reason for her cruelty, referring to other motives.

Chopin became too attached to her and did not want a break. A famous woman, experienced in love affairs, tried all means, but in vain. Then she wrote a novel in which, under fictitious names, she portrayed herself and her lover, and endowed the hero (Chopin) with all conceivable and inconceivable weaknesses, and naturally portrayed herself as an ideal woman. It seemed that the end was inevitable, but Frederick hesitated. He still thought that he could return love. In 1847, ten years after their first meeting, the lovers parted.

A year after the separation, Frederic Chopin and George Sand met in the house mutual friend. Full of remorse, she approached former lover and held out her hands to him. The composer's handsome face turned pale. He recoiled from Sand and silently left the room.

In 1839, George Sand lived in Paris on the Rue Pigalle. Her cozy apartment became a literary salon where Chopin and Delacroix, Heinrich Heine and Pierre Leroux, Pauline Viardot met. Adam Mickiewicz read his poems here.

In 1841, George Sand, together with Pierre Leroux and Louis Viardot, undertook the publication of the journal Independent Review. The magazine dedicated one of its articles to young German philosophers who lived in Paris - Karl Marx and Arnold Ruge. It is known that Karl Marx completed his work "The Poverty of Philosophy" with the words of George Sand from the essay "Jan Zizka" and, as a sign of respect, presented his essay to the author of "Consuelo".

The Independent Review introduced French readers to the literature of other peoples. Articles in this journal were devoted to Koltsov, Herzen, Belinsky, Granovsky. On the pages of the Independent Review in 1841-1842, Sand's well-known novel Horas was published.

In "Oras" characters belong to different strata of the population: workers, students, intellectuals, aristocrats. Their destinies are not any exception, they are generated by new trends, and these trends are reflected in the novel of the writer. George Sand, touching social problems, speaks of the norms of family life, draws the types of new people, active, hardworking, sympathetic, alien to everything petty, insignificant, self-serving. Such, for example, are Laravinier and Barbès. The first is the fruit of the author's creative imagination; he died fighting on the barricades. The second is a historical person, the famous revolutionary Armand Barbès (at one time he was sentenced to death, but at the request of Victor Hugo the execution was replaced by eternal hard labor), who continued the work of Laravignère during the revolution of the forty-eighth year.

Over the next two years, George Sand energetically worked on the dilogy "Consuelo" and "Countess Rudolstadt", published in 1843-1844. She sought in this extensive narrative to give an answer to the important social, philosophical, and religious questions posed by modernity.

In the forties, the authority of George Sand increased so much that a number of magazines were ready to provide her with pages for articles. At that time, Karl Marx and Arnold Ruge undertook the publication of the German-French Yearbook. Together with publishers, F. Engels, G. Heine, M. Bakunin collaborated in it. The editors of the journal asked the author of Consuelo, in the name of the democratic interests of France and Germany, to agree to cooperate in their journal. In February 1844, a double issue of the German-French Yearbook was published, at which point the publication ceased, and, naturally, George Sand's articles were not published.

In the same period, a new novel by George Sand, The Miller from Anzhibo (1845), was published. It depicts provincial customs, the foundations of the French countryside, as they developed in the forties, at a time when noble estates were disappearing.

George Sand's next novel, Monsieur Antoine's Sin (1846), was a success not only in France, but also in Russia. The severity of conflicts, a number of realistic images, the fascination of the plot - all this attracted the attention of readers. At the same time, the novel provided abundant food for critics who ironically perceived " socialist utopias» author.

After the victory on February 24, 1848, the people demanded the establishment of a republic in France; The Second Republic was soon proclaimed. In March, the Ministry of the Interior began to issue Bulletins of the Provisional Government. George Sand was appointed executive editor of this official organ of the government.

With special passion and literary skill, she writes various kinds of proclamations and appeals to the people, collaborates in the leading organs of the democratic press, and establishes the weekly newspaper Delo Naroda. Victor Hugo and Lamartine, Alexandre Dumas and Eugene Xu also took an active part in the social movement.

The defeat of the June uprising in 1848, George Sand took it very painfully: "I no longer believe in the existence of a republic that begins with the murder of its proletarians." In the extremely difficult situation that developed in France in the second half of 1848, the writer defended her democratic convictions. Then she typed open letter, where she strongly protested against the election of Louis Bonaparte as President of the Republic. But soon his election took place. In December 1851, Louis Bonaparte carried out a coup d'etat, and a year later he proclaimed himself emperor under the name of Napoleon III.

George Sand's friendship with Dumas son began in 1851, when he found Sand's letters to Chopin on the Polish border, bought them and returned them to her. Perhaps, and most likely it is, Sand would like their relationship to develop into something more than friendship. But Dumas, the son, was carried away by the Russian princess Naryshkina, his future wife, and Sand was satisfied with the role of mother, friend and adviser.

This forced role sometimes drove her crazy, causing depression and suicidal thoughts. Who knows what could have happened (perhaps even suicide), if not for the truly friendly disposition on the part of Dumas the son. He helped her turn the novel "Marquis de Vilmer" into a comedy - he inherited the gift of editing from his father.

After the December coup, George Sand finally withdrew into herself, settled in Nohant and only occasionally came to Paris. She still worked fruitfully, wrote several novels, essays, "The Story of My Life." To the number latest works Sand include Good Gentlemen of Bois Doré, Daniella, The Snowman (1859), Black City (1861), Nanon (1871).

In 1872 I. S. Turgenev visited Nohant. George Sand, wanting to express her admiration for the talent of the great writer, published an essay from peasant life, Pierre Bonin, which she dedicated to the author of The Hunter's Notes.

Deadly illness caught George Sand at work. She worked on the last novel "Albina", which was not destined to be completed. She died on June 8, 1876 and was buried in the family cemetery in Nohant Park.

Whether Morris syndrome contributed to the disclosure of George Sand's talent, whether it was a matter of physiology, but a talented and brilliant writer, a great lover of great people, a great worker lived her life, overcoming herself and circumstances, and left a bright mark in the history of France and world literature.

From the book of 50 famous patients author Kochemirovskaya Elena

Part Three George Sand Are we fascinated by sensuality? No, this is a desire for something completely different. This agonizing longing to find true love, which always beckons and disappears. Marie

From the book The most piquant stories and fantasies of celebrities. Part 2 by Amills Roser

Chapter Two From Jules Sandeau to George Sand In April 1831, fulfilling her promise to Casimir, she returned to Nohant. She was greeted as if she had returned from the most ordinary trip. Her plump daughter was as good as a clear day; her son almost strangled her in his arms;

From the book Love Letters of Great People. Women author Team of authors

Chapter Three Birth of George Sand Solange's appearance in Paris surprised Aurora's Berrian friends. Is it proper for a mother to take into her illegitimate family a child of three and a half years old? Aurora Dudevant - Émile Regnault: Yes, my friend, I bring Solange and I'm not afraid of what she will experience

From the book Love Letters of Great People. Men author Team of authors

The main dates of the life and work of George Sand 1804, July 1 - Maurice and Antoinette-Sophie-Victoria Dupin had a daughter, Amantina-Lucile-Aurora. 1808, June 12 - Birth of the younger brother Aurora Dupin, who died soon after. Maurice Dupin, father of Georges

From the author's book

George Sand Real name - Amanda Aurora Lyon Dupin, married Dudevant (born in 1804 - died in 1876) Famous French writer, author of the novels Indiana (1832), Horace (1842), Consuelo "(1843) and many others, in which she created images of free, emancipated women.

From the author's book

George Sand They wore mustaches and beards, - Thundering tragedian, novelist, poet ... But in general, the guys were women; After all, there is no more feminine soul than the French! They captivated the whole world with carelessness, They enchanted the world with grace, And with languid beauty they connected the rainy girl's sadness.

From the author's book

SAND GEORGES Real name - Amandine Lucy Aurora Dupin (b. 1804 - d. 1876) George Sand's reputation was scandalous. She wore men's clothing, smoked cigars, and spoke in a low male voice. Her pseudonym itself was male. It is believed that this is how she fought for the freedom of women.

From the author's book

From the author's book

George Sand (1804-1876) ... the feelings that bind us combine so much that they cannot be compared with anything. George Sand, whose real name is Amandine Aurora Lucile Dupin, was born into a wealthy French family that owns an estate in Nohant, near the Indre Valley. At nineteen

From the author's book

Alfred de Musset by George Sand (1833) My dear Georges, I need to tell you something stupid and funny. I'm writing you foolishly, I don't know why, instead of telling you all this after returning from a walk. In the evening, I will fall into despair because of this. You will laugh at me

George Sand (1804-1876)


In the early 30s of the 19th century, a writer appeared in France, whose real name, Aurora Dudevant (née Dupin), is rarely known to anyone. She entered literature under the pseudonym George Sand.

Aurora Dupin belonged to a very noble family on her father, but on her mother she was of democratic origin. After the death of her father, Aurora was brought up in her grandmother's family, and then in a monastery boarding school. Shortly after graduating from the boarding house, she married Baron Casimir Dudevant. This marriage was unhappy; convinced that her husband was a stranger and a distant person to her, the young woman left him, leaving her estate Noan, and moved to Paris. Her situation was very difficult, there was nothing to live on. She decided to try her hand at literature. In Paris, one of her countrymen, the writer Jules Sando, suggested that she write a novel together. This novel, Rose and Blanche, was published under the collective pseudonym Jules Sand and was a great success.

The publisher ordered Aurora Dudevant a new novel, demanding that she keep her pseudonym. But she alone had no right to a collective pseudonym; changing her name in it, she retained the surname Sand. This is how the name George Sand appears, under which she entered literature. Her first novel was Indiana (1832). Following him, other novels appear (Valentina, 1832; Lelia, 1833; Jacques, 1834). During her long life (seventy-two years), she published about ninety novels and short stories.

For the majority, it was unusual that a woman writes and publishes her works, exists on literary earnings. There were a lot of all sorts of stories and anecdotes about her, very often without any basis.

George Sand entered literature somewhat later than Hugo, in the early 1930s; the heyday of her work falls on the 30s and 40s.

First novels. George Sand's first novel, Indiana, brought her well-deserved fame. Of the early novels, it is undoubtedly the best. It's typical romantic novel, in the center of which is an “exceptional”, “incomprehensible” personality. But the author manages to expand the scope of the romantic novel through interesting and deep observations of modern life. Balzac, who was his first critic, drew attention to this side of the work. He wrote that this book is "a reaction of truth against fiction, of our time against the Middle Ages... I don't know of anything written simpler, conceived thinner" 1 .

At the center of the novel is an Indiana Creole family drama. She is married to Colonel Delmare, a rude and despotic man. Indiana becomes infatuated with a young social dandy, frivolous, frivolous Raymond. Both the marriage to Delmar and the infatuation with Raymond would have brought Indiana to ruin if not for the third person who saves her; That's what it is main character Romana is her cousin Ralph.

At first glance, Ralph is an eccentric, an intolerable person with a closed character, embittered, whom no one likes. But it turns out that Ralph is a deep nature and that he alone is truly attached to Indiana. When Indiana discovered and appreciated this true deep love, she came to terms with life. Lovers retire from society, live in complete solitude, and even their best friends consider them dead.

When George Sand wrote Indiana, she had a broad goal in mind. Bourgeois criticism stubbornly saw only one question in the work of George Sand - namely, the women's question. He certainly occupies a large place in her work. In "Indiana" the author recognizes a woman's right to break family ties, if they are painful for her, and to resolve the family issue as her heart tells her.

However, it is easy to see that the problems of George Sand's creativity are not limited to the women's issue. She herself wrote in the preface to the novel that her novel was directed against "tyranny in general." “The only feeling that guided me was a clearly conscious ardent disgust for crude, animal slavery. Indiana is a protest against tyranny in general."

The most realistic figures in the novel are Colonel Delmar, Indiana's husband, and Raymond. Delmare, although honest in his own way, is rude, soulless and callous. It embodies the worst aspects of the Napoleonic military. It is very important to note that the author connects the moral characterization of the hero here with the social one. In the time of George Sand, among very many writers there was an erroneous view of Napoleon as a hero, the liberator of France. George Sandke idealizes Napoleon; she shows that Delmar is despotic, petty and rude, and that he is precisely as a representative of the military environment.

Two tendencies stand out clearly in the novel: the desire to show the Indiana family drama as typical against the background of the social relations of that era and at the same time indicate the only possible romantic way out for it - in loneliness, in distance from society, in contempt for the rude "crowd".

In this contradiction, the weakest aspects of the romantic method of George Sand, who at this period did not know any other solution to the social issue, except for the departure of her heroes from all social evils into their personal, intimate world, affected.

The motif of the individual's romantic protest against the prevailing bourgeois morality reaches its highest point in the novel Lelia (1833).

For the first time in literature, a female demonic image appears. Lelia is disappointed in life, she questions the rationality of the universe, God himself.

The novel "Lelia" reflected in itself those searches and doubts that the writer herself experienced during this period. In one letter, she said about this novel: “I put more of myself into Lelia than into any other book.”

Compared with the novel "Indiana", "Lelia" loses a lot: the image of the social environment is narrowed here. Everything is focused on the world of Lelia herself, on her tragedy and death as a person who does not find the meaning of life.

A turning point in the worldview J. Sand. New ideas and heroes. In the mid-1930s, an important turning point took place in the worldview and work of J. Sand. George Sand is beginning to realize, little by little, that her romantic hero- an individualist, standing as if outside society and opposing himself to it, no longer meets the requirements of life. Life went forward, put forward new questions, and in connection with this, a new hero had to appear.

The work of J. Sand developed already after the July Revolution, when the French bourgeoisie triumphed in complete victory. The labor movement in France in the 1930s acquired a very acute character. During the 1930s, a series of uprisings broke out: the Lyon uprising of the workers of 1831, the uprising in Paris in 1832, then the Lyon uprising of 1834, the uprising in Paris of 1839. The labor question attracted the widest public attention; it has also found its way into the literature. Thus, the very historical situation was such that it forced us to reconsider the problem of romantic individualism. The masses, the working class, and not the individual, entered the arena of struggle against social injustice. The impotence of a solitary individual protest became more and more evident.

Already in the middle of the 1930s, George Sand felt that the principle of non-interference in public and political life, which she had preached until now, was vicious and that it needed to be resolutely reconsidered. “Non-intervention is selfishness and cowardice,” she writes in one letter.

Her further movement along this path is connected with the names of two utopians - Pierre Leroux and Lamenne, with whom George Sand was personally connected and whose teaching had an effect on her. strong influence.

The doctrine of utopian socialism arises in the very early XIX century. The utopians Saint-Simon, Fourier, Robert Owen were in many ways still associated with the Enlightenment. From the enlighteners, they learned the main erroneous position that for the triumph social justice on earth, the conviction of a person, his mind, is enough. Therefore, they taught, it is impossible to foresee the moment of the advent of socialism; it will triumph when the human mind discovers it. Engels writes: "Socialism for all of them is the expression of absolute truth, reason and justice, and one has only to discover it for it to conquer the whole world with its own power" 2 .

In The Communist Manifesto, the utopians are characterized as follows: “The creators of these systems already see the contradictions of classes, as well as the influence of destructive elements within the dominant society itself. But they do not see in the proletariat any historical initiative, any political movement characteristic of it. These mistakes of the utopians are explained historically.

“Immature capitalist production, immature class relations were also matched by immature theories,” wrote Engels. The utopians could not yet understand the historical role of the working class and denied it any historical activity. Hence the main mistake of the utopians, which was that they denied the revolutionary struggle.

But Marx and Engels pointed out that for all the imperfections and fallacies of the utopian systems, they also had great merits: already in the first French revolution they saw not only the nobility and the bourgeoisie, but also the propertyless class. The fate of this poorest and most numerous class is what interests Saint-Simon in the first place.

Pierre Leroux and Lamennet were followers of Saint-Simon, but their teaching appeared in different historical conditions, in conditions of ever deeper class contradictions between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. During this period, the denial of the historical role of the working class and the revolutionary struggle was already of a reactionary character. The improvement of the position of the exploited classes, in their opinion, was possible only on a Christian basis. The preaching of religion becomes their main goal.

"Oras". Pierre Leroux had a particularly strong influence on George Sand. Together with him, she published the magazine Independent Review, which began to appear in 1841, and in the same year Horace, one of her best novels, is published in it.

In this novel, her former romantic hero was severely criticized and exposed. In the image of Horace, the romantic "chosen" nature is brilliantly parodied. The usual romantic situation is preserved, but it is given in a parody.

George Sand mercilessly exposes this "chosen nature." She mocks Horace, ridiculing his complete failure in everything. Whatever Horace undertakes, he discovers his bankruptcy. As a writer, he is a complete fiasco; failure befalls him when he tries to become secular lion. In love, he turns out to be a scoundrel, in political struggle, a coward. Horace has only one desire - to exalt himself by all means. He always plays - sometimes in love, then in republicanism. Having learned that his republican beliefs require not only chatter, but also sacrifice, he quickly changes them, proving that fighting on the barricades is the lot of inferior people. However, this does not prevent him from dreaming about the time when he will die like a hero; Anticipating this, Horace writes his own epitaph in verse beforehand.

Horace is a vivid typical image. In his person, J. Sand exposed the bourgeois young people of that time, who were ready to make a career for themselves at any cost, having nothing in their souls except the ability to chat.

A society where the power of money reigns supreme puts innumerable temptations in the way of young people: wealth, fame, luxury, success, worship - all this was acquired by speculating on one's convictions, selling one's honor and conscience.

It is on this slippery slope that Horace enters, like the hero of Indiana Raymond, and quickly and steadily rolls down.

The typicality of this image was pointed out by Herzen, who enthusiastically spoke about this novel in his diary of 1842: “I greedily ran through“ Horace ”by J. Sand. A great work, quite artistic and profound in meaning. Horace is a face that is purely contemporary to us... How many, having descended into the depths of their souls, will not find in themselves much of Horas? Bragging about feelings that do not exist, suffering for the people, the desire for strong passions, high-profile deeds and complete failure when it comes down to it.

Novels of the 40s. Thus, the teaching of the utopian socialists rendered George Sand an important service in the development of her social outlook. From narrow themes of a personal nature, she moves on to social topics. Exposing the survivals of feudalism, capitalist slavery, and the corrupting role of money now occupies one of the first places in her best social novels of the 1940s (Consuelo, The Wandering Apprentice, M. Antoine's Sin, The Miller of Anjibo).

But we must not forget that the ideas of utopian socialism strongly influenced George Sand and their negative side.

George Sand, following the utopians, denied the revolutionary struggle. Its insolvency utopian ideas it reveals itself most of all where it tries to give some concrete, practical program for the realization of socialism. She, like the Utopians, believed above all in the great power of example. Many of its heroes are reformers, and their specific actions are very naive; more often than not, some chance comes to the aid of the hero. Such is the hero of the novel The Sin of Monsieur Antoine by Emile Cardonnet. On the dowry received for Gilberte, Emil decides to arrange a labor association organized on the principle of free labor and equality. Emil dreams: "In some empty and bare steppe, transformed by my efforts, I would establish a colony of people living with each other like brothers and loving me like a brother."

In the novel The Countess Rudolstadt, George Sand tries to draw a little more concretely the fighters for a new, happy society. She depicts here the secret society of the "Invisibles"; its members conduct extensive underground work; no one can see them, and at the same time they are everywhere. Thus, there are no longer only dreams, but also some practical actions. On what principles is such a secret society organized? When Consuelo is initiated into the society of the Invisibles, she is told the purpose of this society. “We,” says the initiator, “depict the warriors going to conquer the promised land and the ideal society.”

The teachings of the "Invisibles" include the teachings of Huss, Luther, Masons, Christianity, Voltairianism and a number of different systems, one of which fundamentally denies the other. All this testifies to the fact that for J. Sand herself it was extremely unclear what principles should have formed the basis of such a secret society.

The novel "Countess Rudolstadt" is the most striking indicator of the fallacy of the views and positions of the utopian socialists, under whose influence Georges was; Sand. Ideological impotence and utopianism also affected the artistic side of the novel. This is one of her weakest works.

It has a lot of mysticism, secrets, miraculous transformations, disappearances; here are dungeons in which dried corpses, bones, instruments of torture, etc. are hidden.

The strength of George Sand is not in these little successful attempts to realize in artistic images his utopian ideal. Democratic folk images - this is where the greatest strength of the writer was manifested: this is the best that she created.

Sympathy and compassion for the oppressed people are imbued with her best novels. She managed to find living images in which her social sympathies were clothed.

In the novel Horas, she contrasted the heroes of the workers with the protagonist, in whose face she exposed bourgeois careerism, corruption and immorality. This is Laravinier and Paul Arcene. Participants in the Republican uprising of 1832, they were both dangerously wounded during the Battle of Saint-Merry. These are folk heroes who, in contrast to Horace, never talk about heroism, do not take any poses, but, on the other hand, when necessary, sacrifice their lives without hesitation.

The same noble worker, endowed with a high sense of democratic honor, is depicted in the hero of the novel The Traveling Apprentice, Pierre Hugenin.

One of the best images among George Sand's democratic heroes is Consuelo, the heroine of the novel of the same name. Consuelo is the daughter of a simple gypsy, a wonderful singer. Not only her voice is beautiful, but also her whole moral character. The poor, lonely, defenseless girl has such strength of character, such courage and fortitude that she is able to withstand the most cruel and merciless enemies. She is not afraid of any trials, nothing can break her courage: neither prison, nor the despotism of Frederick of Prussia, nor the persecution of her enemies.

Like all democratic heroes in George Sand, Consuelo has a plebeian pride: she leaves the castle of Rudolstadt despite the fact that she becomes the wife of Albert Rudolstadt.

You can name a number of positive images of the people in the works of George Sand. These are the worker Huguenin (“The Wandering Apprentice”), the miller Louis (“The Miller from Anzhibo”), the peasant Jean Japplou (“The Sin of Monsieur Antoine”), this is a whole series of heroes and heroines from her peasant stories (“Little Fadette”, “Damn Swamp " etc.). Truth in the picture folk heroes J. Sand remains in a romantic position; she consciously idealizes these heroes, turns them into bearers of abstract goodness and truth, thus depriving them of typical expressiveness.

But it is important that, while exposing social injustice, despotism, the lack of rights of the people, George Sand at the same time asserts that all the best, healthy comes only from the people and that the salvation of society is in it. The people have such qualities as an innate sense of justice, disinterestedness, honesty, love for nature and work; these are the qualities, according to George Sand, and should bring health improvement to social life.

The merit of George Sand is indisputable: she introduced a new hero into literature and was among the few writers who contributed to the fact that this new democratic hero received citizenship rights in literature. This is the social pathos of her work.

Engels ranked George Sand among those writers who made an important revolution in literature. He wrote: “The place of kings and princes, who used to be the heroes of such works, is now beginning to be occupied by the poor, the contemptible class, whose life and fate, joys and sufferings constitute the content of novels ... this is a new direction among writers, to which Georges belongs Sand, Eugene Xu and Boz (Dickens), is undoubtedly a sign of the times” 3 .

The February Revolution of 1848 captures George Sand in the maelstrom of its events. She is on the side of the rebellious people. By editing the Bulletin of the Republic, she is in opposition to the very moderate majority of the provisional government, demanding a republic and better working conditions; she declared that if the provisional government did not ensure the triumph of democracy, the people had no choice but to declare their will again.

During this period, J. Sand closely associated the political struggle with his work; in her opinion, literature should become one of the areas of the common struggle. More and more often, in her theoretical works, the idea appears that an artist who lives alone, in his own closed sphere, and does not breathe the same air with his era, is doomed to sterility.

It was at this time that George Sand attacked the theory of "art for art's sake" with particular passion. For her, this formula does not make any sense. Indeed, pedantry has never gone so far in its absurdity as in this theory of "art for art's sake": after all, this theory does not respond to anything, is not based on anything, and no one in the world, including its heralds and opponents, could never put it into practice.

But further development revolutionary events and deepening contradictions in the revolution of 1848 have a negative impact on George Sand. Her former revolutionary enthusiasm is replaced by confusion.

Disappointment in the revolution, misunderstanding of the paths in which the revolutionary movement should go, because it did not go further than the ideas of the utopians, lead it to refuse any participation in social life, and this negatively affects her work, manifesting itself as a decrease in the ideological and artistic nature of her later works (“Valvedr”, “Marquis Wilmer” and many others).

Much in the work of J. Sand belongs to the past. The weaknesses of her utopian views and artistic method did not escape the gaze of the brilliant Russian critic Belinsky, who in general highly appreciated J. Sand.

But her best works do not lose their significance for us either: they excite with their democracy, optimism, their love for the working man.

Notes.

1. Sat. "Balzac on Art". M. - L., "Art", 1941, pp. 437 - 438.

2. K. Marx and F. Engels. Works, vol. 19, p. 201.

3. K. Marx and F. Engels. Works, vol. 1, p. 542.

In real, passionate love, Aurora Dudevant knew a lot. Such love permeated her whole life and all her work. This pretty graceful woman concealed in herself a huge inner strength, which was not to hide. She broke through in all the actions of Aurora, which often shocked the environment. After all, Amandine Aurora Lucile, nee Dupin, lived her whole life in the nineteenth century. And the women of that time relied, at a minimum, restraint. She was resolute, assertive, enterprising, self-confident - in general, she possessed all the qualities so not inherent in her contemporaries. Brown-eyed Aurora with a strong-willed chin, very fond of horse riding and comfortable clothes for this activity - a men's suit, was born a couple of centuries earlier than it should have been.
Her independence was an explanation. After all, the future famous writer from the age of four actually remained an orphan. His father died during a horseback ride, and his mother soon left for Paris, not seeing eye to eye with her mother-in-law. Grandmother was a countess and considered that only she, and not a commoner mother, could be entrusted with the upbringing of a girl. So the future inheritance, the grandmother's firm character, and the mother's too prudent and not strong enough love separated her from her daughter. They were never close again, they met very rarely, which made Aurora suffer a lot.
From the age of fourteen, her grandmother gave her granddaughter to be raised in a Catholic monastery. During the two years of her stay in it, Aurora was imbued with mystical moods. But the poor health of her grandmother brought the girl back to the estate, where she fell in love with horses and philosophical books. Love for music and literature, horseback riding, a good education, as well as an acute lack of love - these are the luggage that the girl carried from childhood.
Romantic, freedom-loving nature longed for love. At the same time, Aurora was very sociable, interesting in conversation, and she quickly had fans. But the mothers of these admirers were not at all eager to marry their sons to a rich commoner, and even with liberties in behavior. Then Aurora Dupin met Casimir Dudevant, the illegitimate son of Baron Dudevant. Casimir was nine years older than her and personified real masculinity in her eyes. They got married, began to lead the life of landowners in her estate in Nohant. A year later, the Dudevant couple had a son, Maurice. But the choice of Aurora was unsuccessful. There was no real spiritual intimacy with her husband, he also did not experience the romantic love that she so dreamed of. Casimir was not romantic in nature, he was not fond of music and literature. Again, Aurora felt lonely and began dating a friend of her youth. Even the birth of Solange's daughter did not save the marriage. In fact, it fell apart, and, maintaining its visibility, the couple decided to live separately for six months. With another lover, Aurora left for Paris.
For financial independence, Aurora begins to write novels. But Casimir's stepmother Dudevant flatly refused to read her last name on the covers of books, and had to choose a pseudonym. The choice of the male pseudonym George Sand was very consistent with the character of the writer and saved her from any explanations. Living in a world of men, now she herself has become a little bit of a man. Aurora inherited the iron will of her great-grandfather, French Marshal Maurice of Saxony. She needed independence, hence money and success. And now with male name George Sand could become in the literary environment on a par with male writers. Her works were a huge success, especially the novel "Indiana".
In Paris, Aurora meets the poet Alfred de Musset, and they begin a torturous romance of people who are completely unsuitable for each other. George Sand's attitude to life, people and events was more masculine than feminine. Alfred was jealous, angry, and, in the end, they broke up. In his letter, he honestly admitted that he loves her, as a woman usually loves a man, but he does not agree to be a woman.
She retained the same balance of power with Chopin, but, alas, the relationship went too far, and the ending was sad.

From the first meeting, Frederic Chopin did not like Aurora Dudevant. First, she herself decisively introduced herself to him. He was not ready for such pressure, and in response he only slightly shook her hand. Secondly, she laughed at this and squeezed his soft fingers tightly like a man. And he was especially sensitive to his hands. Frederick now tried to avoid meeting this unsympathetic woman. But it was already too late. His divine performance of Liszt, and especially of his magical compositions, has already won the heart of Aurora. And Chopin's fragile, intelligent appearance and impeccable manners did not leave her a retreat. She boldly marched into battle.
George Sand wrote to his closest friend Albert Grzhimala a frank letter of thirty-two pages about her feelings for Chopin. She had been friends with Albert for many years and, as an old acquaintance, in this letter began to ask him about Frederick's bride, the nature of their relationship and the possibility of combining them with her. She agrees to be a mistress, and she herself offered it. The letter received wide publicity in secular circles. Everyone made fun of George Sand. And Grzhimala defended her, saying that just imagine the man writing in the place, and everything falls into place. He wrote to the writer himself that the engagement had long been upset and Chopin was alone enough in Paris, but there was no need to put pressure on him. "Chopin is shy as a doe, and if you want to tame him, disguise your remarkable strength."
Sand was a little offended by the accuracy of Grzhimala's definition of her problem - too assertive, independent character. Because of this, all relationships with men in her life collapsed. But what to do. She recently officially divorced Dudevant, is very much in love and does not intend to back down.
Aurora nevertheless persuaded Frederick to come to her family estate in Noan. There, on long walks, listening to his stories about Poland, mother, attentively listening to his music, and giving practical advice, she managed to reach his location. And the incident with the hostess's son's tutor made Chopin respect her even more. The musician all the time caught the jealous gaze of this Malfil, and even the servant whispered that he was the mistress's lover and unusually jealous. But one evening, Frederic overheard a conversation between the tutor and Aurora, in which he reproached her for her love for Chopin. But the resourceful hostess did not deny her feelings for the musician and invited Malfil to leave her house. Chopin was shocked by her unladylike determination. The next morning, he suddenly noticed how beautiful, flexible and gentle she was - Frederick fell in love.
Aurora easily persuaded Chopin to leave for Mallorca to live together as lovers. She was seven years older than him, and in fact a hundred years older, and he recognized her authority. With them were her children: fifteen-year-old Maurice and ten-year-old Solange. Frederick was at first delighted, but the rains charged, and the house without heating became damp. Chopin began to cough violently, and three visiting doctors independently diagnosed him with consumption. Sand refused to believe it and put the doctors out the door. But the owners, frightened by a contagious disease, quickly survived them. They moved to a monastery in the mountains abandoned by the monks. This place was as romantic as it was creepy. Poor lighting, eagles circling at the level of the monastery, forest night sounds frightened the sick Frederick very much. He was pale, weak, nervous, and he demanded a date for departure.
They returned to Paris via Barcelona. There, he began to bleed in his throat, and local doctors gave him only two weeks to live, confirming the terrible diagnosis. Frederick convulsively clutched at the sheet and began to cry. It turns out that since childhood he was haunted by a premonition of an early death. And now everything comes true, intuition did not deceive him.
But George Sand was adamant and kept talking about catarrh. She gave Chopin a medallion with her portrait saying that this talisman would save him. And Frederick believed it. He had a mystical certainty that as long as Aurora was with him, he would live. The disease receded, and they were able to return to Paris. A very fruitful period of the composer's work began. At the piano, he was her god. But as soon as he moved away from the instrument, he again became her boy, indecisive and dependent.
One day, while playing the piano in the living room, Sand noticed beads of sweat on Frederick's forehead. This was a terrible harbinger of a returning illness. She interrupted the concert, apologizing to the guests. Chopin was very unhappy that everything was decided without his advice. But such cases began to repeat. She cared for him in her own way, with her usual determination, and it humiliated and infuriated him. The conflict turned into an intimate sphere. Frederick was increasingly unable to satisfy Aurora's desires. Once he said terrible words to her: “You behave in such a way that it is impossible to desire you. You look like a soldier, not a woman!” She immediately remembered a letter from Alfred de Musset with almost the same words. Since then, they have gone to different bedrooms.
However, their shared passion for music continued. In a Parisian apartment, they arranged a music salon where Balzac, Delacroix, Heinrich Heine, Adam Mickiewicz and other celebrities gathered. But Chopin's discontent continued in this drawing room. In no way could his impeccable taste and manners please a girlfriend in tight trousers with a cigar in her mouth. To which Aurora replied that she was not just a woman, she was George Sand. Jealousy was also mixed with external discontent. After all, all these men admired his girlfriend and flirted with her. Then Chopin became jealous of Sand to work, demanded to quit writing. And George Sand was distinguished by her great capacity for work at any time of the day and in any situation. But the reminder of who mainly brings the money into the house sobered him up.
Frederick decided to somehow take revenge on Aurora for all the humiliation. Her eighteen-year-old daughter Solange showed more and more attention to him. She flirted with her mother's friend, and suddenly her efforts began to bear fruit. Chopin began to play in the room for Solange alone, which only Sand had previously been honored with, courted, made compliments. And he needed Aurora only for the duration of the attacks. Her pride was wounded, and they parted. Solange, who was not distinguished by sincere kindness, further aggravated their relationship by telling Chopin in secret that her mother still has other lovers.
Chopin died two years after his break with George Sand at the age of thirty-nine. Pride did not allow Frederick to call her goodbye.