Olga Alinskaya

Completed the training

Hello!
Social rank is the value of a person's skin. What matters to him is the number of zeros in the bank account. Hence the feeling of superiority over those who do not participate in social rankings, or are not so successful.
There is a manifestation in the visual vector - snobbery. It is not based on money, although if there is skin underneath, it may well complement the skin feeling of material and social superiority with intellectual superiority.

In addition, people who do not possess systemic perception consider sound and olfactory people to be arrogant. In sound there is a feeling - I am above you all, and in smell - you are all below me. You can call it arrogance, right?
There is a great risk of making a mistake.
In addition, people who have not undergone training interpret what they observe in others based on their value system. This is quite natural for non-systemic perception. Thus, defining others through themselves, people attribute their own desires and thoughts to others.
Therefore, I invite you to a full training in system-vector psychology in order to learn how to observe the psyche of different people and accurately determine the causes of certain of its manifestations.
Don't miss the free lectures in February.
All the best!

Olga Sarafanova

Completed the training

Good evening!

In any field you can meet people with this attitude. This is how a leather worker can manifest himself, who looks at a person from the position of “benefit-benefit”, i.e. “if he is poor, then he is not useful, there are no connections that can be useful to me,” etc. This is his nature - he strives for property and social superiority, to compete, to be an individualist, “his shirt is closer to his body.”

We must not forget that we look at people through the prism of our desires. It may seem to us that people behave in one way or another. Without a clear understanding of the psyche of another person, it is difficult for us to do this. The category of respect/disrespect is inherent in the anal vector. About the skinner, he will think that he is arrogant with a disrespectful attitude towards him, for example.

There are also such concepts as snobbery in the visual vector or egocentrism in the sound vector. The same anal person will think about the sound person that he is arrogant, but in reality such a person is “in himself” and may simply be uncommunicative. Visual snobbery is a manifestation of a certain superiority over others, based on the feeling of one’s high intelligence. It is common for such a person to use “subtle” hints to show another that he is inferior to him and at the same time, as it were, to be “condescending” towards him.

Read articles on these topics:


Ekaterina Krestnikova

Completed the training

Psychiatrist, psychiatrist-narcologist

Hello! The definition of “respect” is characteristic of a person with an anal vector. People perceive each other only through themselves. An anal person sees a dishonest anal person in his skin, and does not respect him, regardless of his income. A skin person considers it irrational to interact with a skin person who is lower than him in the system of social and property superiority. A person with the skin vector may consider communication with an anal person unprofitable, perceiving him as a skin-nerd.
Sound egocentrism and visual snobbery are not about respect.
In addition, there are organized groups of people in which it is customary to have certain views, often these are false beliefs. This also needs to be taken into account.
And yet, yes, income, the social ladder are the values ​​of the skin vector.
When you see everyone through yourself like this, it’s very easy to get confused! There is an opportunity to learn to see people as they are. Come to free lectures
All the best to you!

Olga Sarafanova

Completed the training

Hello!

The category of underdevelopment/unrealization is a fairly generalized concept. They are needed for a superficial understanding of human assignment in SVP. A leather worker may be undeveloped, but still be at the top of the social ladder. Or it is developed, but not sufficiently realized in its volume and thus fills its shortcomings.

Again, this is more a matter of our perception. An undeveloped skin worker may or may not show his superiority. His underdevelopment is determined by his actions, each vector has its own. In real life, this is the desire to steal, lie, scam someone, economize to the point of absurdity, etc. By himself, he may be sufficiently educated in the cultural superstructure and educated.
A developed skin worker, for example a manager, can be dry and demanding of employees. For him, people are resources, he needs results. He does not shake hands because there is no time, that is, both of these skinners may seem arrogant.

Sometimes we look at the same properties in a person that we ourselves possess and, depending on development, we perceive them in one way or another. For example, a hysterical KZ will hate such a KZ, only a developed one. There cannot be any specifics here; for this you need to accurately determine the behavior of a particular person, and also take into account the presence of other vectors.

Articles on the topic of skin vector.


How often do we say “thank you” to people close to us? How often do we thank them sincerely? There is no need to deny that sometimes we don’t do this at all, we forget, or we simply don’t want to. Meanwhile, disrespect and ingratitude are becoming a kind of habits that plague modern society.

In the text, N.I. Pirogov raises the problem of disrespectful attitude, which manifests itself in ingratitude and disrespect. Can it be called acceptable?

She did not want him to work, she was ready to share “her bread” with him. But at that time he could not appreciate it. His sisters took on small jobs to provide for the family. And when my brother needed a uniform, they sewed it from old things. But their efforts were not rewarded with due gratitude, which the author regrets.

Sometimes a person does not know how to express his gratitude to those who deserve it - such disrespect for the merits of people cannot be justified by anything. The author strives to convey this to the reader so that he does not make such mistakes.

In the novel by F. M. Dostoevsky “Humiliated and Insulted” there is confirmation of the author’s words. Natasha, the heroine of the work, betrays her family by running away from home with her lover. But she soon loses it, after which she realizes that she was wrong, that she did not appreciate what she had. She is tormented by her conscience, she cannot find peace because she was not grateful.

Everyone should learn to appreciate the people who surround him and what they do for him.

Updated: 2018-07-24

Attention!
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and click Ctrl+Enter.
By doing so, you will provide invaluable benefits to the project and other readers.

Thank you for your attention.

.

Essay on the Unified State Exam according to the text:" Among many shameful acts that I have accomplished in my life, one is most memorable to me.In the orphanage, there was a loudspeaker hanging in the corridor, and one day a voice was heard from it, unlike anyone else, and for some reason - most likely just the dissimilarity - irritated me..." (ByV.P. Astafiev) .

Full text

(1) Among the many shameful acts that I have committed in life, one is most memorable to me. (2) In the orphanage, there was a loudspeaker hanging in the corridor, and one day a voice was heard from it, unlike anyone else, and for some reason - most likely just the dissimilarity - irritated me. (3) “Ha... Yells like a stallion!” - I said and pulled the speaker plug out of the socket. (4) The singer’s voice broke off. (5) The kids reacted sympathetically to my action, since in childhood I was the most singing and reading person. (6) ...Many years later in Essentuki, in a spacious summer hall, I listened to a symphony concert. (7) All the musicians of the Crimean orchestra, who had seen and experienced in their time, with the glorious, ant-like, young conductor Zinaida Tykach, patiently explained to the public what and why they would play, when, by whom and on what occasion this or that musical composition was written. (8) They did this, as it were, with an apology for their intrusion into the life of citizens so oversaturated with spiritual values, being treated and simply fattening at the resort, and the concert began with Strauss’s dashing overture in order to prepare listeners overtired by culture for the second, more serious part. (9) But the fabulous Strauss, the fiery Brahms, and the flirtatious Offenbach did not help - already from the middle of the first part of the concert, the listeners, who had crowded into the hall for the musical event only because it was free, began to leave the hall. (10) Yes, if they just left him like that, silently, cautiously - no, they left him with indignation, shouting, and abuse, as if they had been deceived in their best desires and dreams. (11) Chairs in concert hall old, Viennese, with round wooden seats, knocked together in order, and every citizen, rising from his seat, considered it his duty to slam the seat indignantly. (12) I sat, huddled in myself, listening to the musicians strain themselves to drown out the noise and swearing in the hall, and I wanted to ask forgiveness for all of us from the dear conductor in a black tailcoat, from the orchestra members, who work so hard and persistently to earn their honest , poor bread, apologize for all of us and tell us how I was in childhood... (13) But life is not a letter, there is no postscript in it. (14) What does it matter that the singer whom I once insulted with a word, her name is the great Nadezhda Obukhova, became my most favorite singer, that I “corrected” and cried more than once while listening to her. (15) She, the singer, will never hear my repentance and will not be able to forgive me. (16) But, already elderly and gray-haired, I shudder at every clap and rattle of a chair in the concert hall... when musicians with all their strength, capabilities and talent try to convey the suffering of an early-suffered myopic young man wearing defenseless round glasses. (17) He, in his dying symphony, the unfinished song of his aching heart, has been stretching out his hands into the hall for more than a century and pleadingly crying out: “(18) People, help me! (19) Help!.. (20) Well, if you can’t help me, at least help yourself!..”

Everyone has their own business in this life. It seems to me that the work of any person should be respected, be it the work of a carpenter, engineer, teacher or musician. Every diligent and dedicated person to his work is worthy of attention and respect. The problem of impoliteness, rudeness, and indifference towards human labor is raised in this text.

Reflecting on the problem, the author tells us a story about a Crimean orchestra that played for free for vacationers in Essentuki. Most listeners did not like it classical works, and people behaved rudely, noisily leaving their seats right during the musical event: “...they left with indignation, shouts, and abuse, as if they had been deceived in the best desires and places.” The lyrical hero felt shame for the behavior of the vacationers, who do not respect the musicians who “... are trying with all their strength, capabilities and talent to convey the suffering of the composer.”

I completely agree with the author. To support my words, I would like to cite a parable that I once heard from my grandmother. The story told about a father who invited his son to throw money honestly earned by the head of the family into the fireplace. The son hesitated, but after his father’s insistence he burned the bills, then the father suggested throwing away the money the son himself had earned. The hero could not, citing the fact that he spent too much effort on earning them. This is how badly we sometimes treat other people’s hard work. The parable makes you think about respect for other people's work.

Undoubtedly, a person’s work evokes respect from others. The hero of Turgenev's novel "Fathers and Sons" Evgeny Bazarov is a true worker. He believes that only back-breaking work can achieve a goal. Bazarov, by birth, is the son of a simple doctor, so he achieved a lot only through his own efforts and boundless thirst for knowledge. Despite controversial views on life and some reckless actions, it is impossible not to feel respect for our hero. So both the yard boys and the servants of the Kirsanov family, with whom Bazarov was visiting, were drawn to Evgeniy, although he did not think of seeking their favor. Indeed, one may not love this hero, but one cannot help but respect him, because work is not easy for anyone.

It seems to me that a person should be judged not only by his own work, but also by how he treats others. The ability to honor the work of others is what truly inspires respect.

(341 words, not including quotes)

The focus is on the figure of Emelyan Pugachev - a rebel, a man who opposed the authorities. What prompted him to do this? Why did he not only encroach on the throne himself, but also lead the people with him? How did the people believe the impostor? Why? Under the burden of years, we can forget the historical context in which the idea of ​​​​rebellion was born. People (note, not slaves, not cattle), being in serfdom from their not always humane masters (remember, for example, Skotinin from “The Minor”), were forced to obey their will, unquestioningly listening to every, even delusional, demand. The idea of ​​a good king lived in the heart of every person. A brave, daring, desperate rebel took responsibility and decided to give people freedom, albeit short-lived, albeit ephemeral, but freedom. The degree of his courage can only be assessed by understanding the fairy tale told to Grinev. Pugachev initially knew the final outcome of the events into which he plunged his country. But he was not afraid, did not loot and disappeared. No, he went to the scaffold to prove how inhuman power can plunge a country into the horror of a merciless bloody massacre.

2. A.A. Akhmatova "Requiem"

The poem was written at a time when Stalin's repressions brought the entire country to its knees, when the author of the poem herself stood in line to be handed over to her son, who was condemned as an enemy of the people. The poem was formed from memories and living impressions:

It was when I smiled
Only dead, glad for the peace.

The lyrical heroine draws a parallel between the fate of her contemporary and her old compatriot, whose husband was executed as a Streltsy rebel

I will be like the Streltsy wives,
Howl under the Kremlin towers.
Death stars stood above us
And innocent Rus' writhed
Under bloody boots
And under the black tires there is marusa.

3. M.A. Bulgakov “The Master and Margarita”

The main character of the novel is the Master, a man living in the terrible time of Stalin’s repressions. Having written a novel about Pontius Pilate, he touched upon the problem of a person’s responsibility for a decision made. His main character in the Master's novel - the procurator of Judea - a man invested with almost unlimited power, doubts that he is right. This phenomenon is practically unacceptable for the authorities. For the era of Stalinism, a person in power has no right to doubt that his decision is fair. This means that such a work is a priori harmful. The master is arrested. This act broke him, made him weak-willed. Thus, a person who opposed the authorities found himself outlawed and himself subjected to repression.

4. A.I. Solzhenitsyn "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich"

The story is dedicated to the fate of a man who found himself in a camp on charges of treason, although his whole fault was that he was in captivity for several days, but came out of encirclement and was ready to defend his Motherland further. However, his action seemed like a betrayal to the authorities. While serving his sentence, Ivan Denisovich carefully preserves his human dignity, he works and complies with all the requirements of the law that prevails in the zone. This is a kind of denial of Shukhov’s guilt. This person is always and everywhere law-abiding. Why is he disliked by the authorities? It’s just that the authorities are looking for enemies, and who is among them today is of little importance.

Sloppiness in clothing is, first of all, disrespect for the people around you, and also disrespect for yourself. It's not about being dressed smartly.

In dandy clothing there is, perhaps, an exaggerated idea of ​​one's own elegance, and for the most part the dandy is on the verge of the ridiculous. You must dress cleanly and neatly, in the style that suits you best, and depending on your age. Sportswear will not make an old man an athlete if he does not play sports. A “professor’s” hat and a black formal suit are impossible on the beach or in the forest picking mushrooms.

How should we evaluate our attitude towards the language we speak? Language, even more than clothing, testifies to a person’s taste, his attitude towards the world around him, towards himself.

There are various kinds of sloppiness in human language. If a person was born and lives away from the city and speaks his own dialect, there is no sloppiness in this. I don’t know about others, but I like these local dialects, if they are strictly maintained. I like their melodiousness, I like local words, local expressions. Dialects are often an inexhaustible source of enrichment of the Russian literary language. Once in a conversation with me, the writer Fyodor Aleksandrovich Abramov said: “Granite was exported from the Russian North for the construction of St. Petersburg and the word was exported - the word in stone blocks of epics, lamentations, lyrical songs... “Correct” the language of epics - translate it into Russian standards literary language is simply to spoil epics.”

It’s a different matter if a person lives in a city for a long time, knows the norms of the literary language, and retains the forms and words of his village. This may be because he thinks they are beautiful and is proud of them. This doesn't bother me. Let him sing and retain his usual melodiousness. In this I see pride in my homeland - my village. This is not bad, and it does not humiliate a person. It is as beautiful as a now forgotten blouse, but only on a person who has worn it since childhood and is accustomed to it. If he put it on to show off in it, to show that he is “truly rural,” then this is both funny and cynical: “Look what I am like: I didn’t give a damn about the fact that I live in the city. I want to be different from all of you!”

Flaunting rudeness in language, like flaunting rudeness in manners, sloppiness in clothing, is a very common phenomenon, and it mainly indicates a person’s psychological insecurity, his weakness, and not at all his strength. The speaker tries to suppress in himself with a rude joke, harsh expression, irony, cynicism the feeling of fear, apprehension, sometimes just apprehension. By using rude nicknames from teachers, it is the weak-willed students who want to show that they are not afraid of them. This happens semi-consciously. I'm not even talking about the fact that this is a sign of bad manners, lack of intelligence, and sometimes cruelty. But the same underlying reason underlies any rude, cynical, recklessly ironic expressions in relation to those phenomena Everyday life that somehow injure the speaker. This is rude talking people as if they want to show that they are above those phenomena that they are actually afraid of. The basis of any slang, cynical expressions and swearing is weakness. People who “spit words” demonstrate their contempt for traumatic events in life because they bother them, torment them, worry them, because they feel weak and not protected against them.

A truly strong and healthy, balanced person will not speak loudly unnecessarily, will not swear or use slang words. After all, he is sure that his word is already significant.

Our language is a vital part of our overall behavior in life. And by the way a person speaks, we can immediately and easily judge who we are dealing with: we can determine the degree of intelligence of a person, the degree of his psychological balance, the degree of his possible “complexity” (there is such a sad phenomenon in the psychology of some weak people, but I don’t have the opportunity to explain it now - this is a big and special question).

You need to learn good, calm, intelligent speech for a long time and carefully - listening, remembering, noticing, reading and studying. But even though it is difficult, it is necessary, necessary. Our speech is the most important part of not only our behavior (as I already said), but also our personality, our soul, mind...

(D.S. Likhachev)

Composition

The main problem posed by D.S. Likhachev in this text is the problem of a person’s relationship to language. What role does speech play in creating a person’s image? What is behind rudeness, swearing, cynical expressions? These are the questions the author asks.

This problem is very relevant for our modern life. A careless attitude to words is typical to the younger generation, who has mastered the language of SMS texts and Internet users. This primitive language is impoverishing spiritual world young people. That is why D.S. Likhachev wants to draw the attention of readers to this problem.

The scientist believes that our language is the most important component of our communication. And a person’s speech often shapes his image in the eyes of others. At the same time, the author does not condemn dialect speech; he understands that this language “does not require correction.” But rudeness, violation of literary norms, cynical expressions, unfounded irony - all these phenomena cause sincere indignation of the scientist. He notes that behind all this is not only a lack of education and lack of intelligence, but also the internal weakness of people, their fear, vulnerability to life events. In the finale, he calls on us to “learn good, calm, intelligent speech.”

Text by D.S. Likhacheva is very bright, imaginative, expressive. Revealing his point of view, he uses a variety of means artistic expression: comparison (“it’s as beautiful as a now-forgotten braid”), epithet (“recklessly ironic expressions”), rows of homogeneous members (“The speaker strives with a rude joke, harsh expression, irony, cynicism to suppress in himself the feeling of fear, fear, sometimes just concerns").

Violations of the culture of speech are also explored by K. Chukovsky in his book “Alive as Life. Stories about the Russian language." This writer is very concerned about the rapid development of clericalism in our country and the primitiveness of youth jargon. He also believes that such language simplifies our thinking.

Thus, according to S. Lvov, language is closely connected with our thinking, psychology, and way of life. Language forms a person’s image and reveals it inner world. And here I involuntarily remember the words of Socrates: “Speak so that I can see you.”