Characteristics of Chatsky grief from the mind with quotes. The image of Chatsky ("Woe from Wit"). Characteristics of Chatsky. Brief description of Chatsky

Characteristics of Chatsky based on the work "Woe from Wit"

The comedy was written in the 20s of the XIX century. After the victorious war with Napoleon in 1812, when the Russian people dealt a mortal blow to the Napoleonic army, which had won invincible glory in Europe, a contradiction arose with particular acuteness between the greatest possibilities of ordinary Russian people and the plight in which they were at the behest of the mighty of this world, in Arakcheev reaction raged across the country. Honest people of that time could not put up with this. Among the progressive-minded nobility, protests and dissatisfaction with the existing order were brewing, and secret societies were created. And so the appearance of these sprouts of protest was embodied in his comedy by A.S. Griboedov, bringing face to face "the current century and the past century."

The first pages of the comedy were read... It became clear: everyone in Famusov's house was waiting for the person who interested me so much. Who is he? Why is he the only one they talk about in this house? Why does Liza, the maid, remember him as a cheerful, witty person, while Sofya, Famusov's daughter, does not even want to hear about Chatsky? And later I am convinced that Famusov is also irritated and alarmed. Why? All these questions I need to resolve. Comedy from the very first pages interested me.

The plot basis of the work is the conflict of the young nobleman Chatsky with the society from which he himself came. The events of the comedy unfold in one Moscow aristocratic house within one day. But Griboyedov managed to expand the temporal and spatial framework of the work, giving a complete picture of the life of the noble society of that time and showing the new, lively, advanced that was born in its depths.

So, it turns out that Chatsky, who was orphaned early, lived in the house of his guardian Famusov, a friend of his father, and was brought up with his daughter, having received an excellent home education from foreign tutors. "The habit of being together every day is inseparable" bound them with childhood friendship. But soon the young man Chatsky became "bored" in Famusov's house, where there were no serious mental interests, and he "moved out", that is, he began to live separately, on his own, made good friends, seriously engaged in the sciences. During these years, his friendly disposition towards Sophia becomes a serious feeling. But love for the girl did not distract him from the pursuit of knowledge, to the study of life. He goes to "wander". Three years have passed ... And now our hero is back in Moscow, in Famusov's house. He hurries to see Sophia, whom he passionately loves. And such sincerity, such love and joy from meeting with his beloved girl can be heard in his voice! He is lively, cheerful, witty, handsome! Chatsky is overwhelmed with the joy of life and does not know that trouble awaits him: after all, Sophia loves not him, but her father's secretary, the cunning liar Molchalin.

Chatsky does not even suspect how Sophia has changed during his absence, he trusts her, as in the days of early youth. And Sophia not only does not love him, but is even ready to hate him for his sharp words against Molchalin. She is capable of lies, pretense, gossip, just to hurt, to take revenge on Chatsky. In Chatsky's playful, caustic remarks, she cannot feel the pain of a person who truly loves his homeland. Chatsky and Famusov meet as close people. But soon we are convinced that there are constant clashes between them.

In Famusov's house, Chatsky meets Skalozub, a possible contender for Sophia's hand. It is here that a tense ideological struggle arises and flares up between Famusov, the defender of the autocratic serf order, and Chatsky, the patriot, the defender of "free life", the spokesman for the ideas of the Decembrists, new ideas about man and his place in society. The dispute between them is about the dignity of a person, his value, about honor and honesty, about the attitude to service, about the place of a person in society.

Chatsky scathingly criticizes the arbitrariness of serfdom, the cynicism and heartlessness of the "fathers of the fatherland", their pathetic admiration for everything foreign, their careerism, their fierce resistance to moving forward, to a better life.

Famusov is afraid of people like Chatsky, as they encroach on the way of life, which is the basis of well-being for the Famusovs. The self-satisfied serf-owner teaches the "proud people of today" how to live, and sets as an example sycophants and careerists like Maxim Petrovich.

Could, say, Belinsky, Ryleev, Griboyedov keep silent in such a case? Hardly! That is why we perceive Chatsky's accusatory monologues and remarks so naturally. The hero is indignant, despises, scoffs, accuses, while thinking out loud, not paying attention to how others will react to his thoughts.

Chatsky owns the seething passion of a fighter for a just society. He wants to bring the enemies to "white heat" and express his truth.

Anger and resentment of a citizen give him energy.

Reading the comedy, I admire more and more how expressively Griboyedov compared Chatsky and his rivals. Chatsky evokes my sympathy and respect, recognition of his noble deeds. His statements about the world of feudal lords are close and dear to me.

The secular crowd, skillfully depicted by Griboedov's pen, is the personification of meanness, ignorance, inertia. In my opinion, Sophia, whom our hero loves so much, can be attributed to this crowd. After all, it is she who inflicts a treacherous blow on him: writing gossip about Chatsky's madness. I understand that she wanted to avenge his ridicule towards Molchalin. But you can't be so cruel and inhuman! After all, she is a representative of the fair sex, and suddenly such meanness! The fiction about Chatsky's madness is spreading with lightning speed. Nobody believes, but everyone repeats. Finally, this gossip reaches Famusov. When the guests begin to list the reason for Chatsky's madness, another meaning of this phrase is revealed: in their opinion, crazy means "freethinker". Everyone is trying to establish the cause of the madness. Khlestova says: “He drank tea beyond his years,” but Famusov is firmly convinced:

Learning is the plague

Learning is the reason...

Then various measures are proposed to combat the "madness". Colonel Skalozub, narcissistic, stupid colonel of stick drill, enemy of freedom and enlightenment, dreaming of the rank of general, says:

I will make you happy: the general rumor,

That there is a project at the expense of lyceums, schools, gymnasiums;

There they will only teach in our way: one, two;

And the schools will be preserved like this: for big occasions.

And Famusov, as if summarizing his judgments about enlightenment, says:

If evil is to be stopped:

Take away all the books and burn them.

Thus, Chatsky is recognized as crazy for his free-thinking. He is hated by reactionary society as an ideological enemy, as an advanced freedom-loving person. And the society is taking measures to neutralize it, erecting vile slander on it. Soon Chatsky heard gossip about his madness. He is hurt, bitter, but this does not worry him as deeply as who Sophia loves, why she is so cold towards him.

And suddenly there is an unexpected resolution of these issues. Chatsky witnessed an accidentally overheard conversation between Molchalin and the maid Lisa. Molchalin confesses his love to the girl, but the maid boldly hints at his wedding with the young lady, Sophia, shames Molchalin. And then Molchalin "takes off his mask": he confesses to Liza that "there is nothing enviable in Sofya Pavlovna", that he is in love with her "by position", "who feeds and waters, and sometimes gives her a rank." Anger and shame torment Chatsky: "Here I am sacrificed to whom!". How he was deceived in Sophia! His happy rival is Molchalin, a low hypocrite and a deceiver, a "fool", a "famous servant", convinced that "in his years", in his rank "should not dare to have his own judgment", but should, "pleasing everyone, and awards to take and have fun."

And Sophia, who was going on a date with Molchalin, accidentally heard his frank confession to Lisa. She is surprised, offended, humiliated! After all, she loved him so much, idealized this insignificant person! What a pitiful part Sophia had played in his life! But the girl finds the strength in herself to forever abandon delusions, push away Molchalin crawling at her feet, but she cannot defend and justify herself before Chatsky. Chatsky inflicted another wound: he learns that the ridiculous gossip about his madness belongs to Sophia. No, he will never be able to forgive her, because he also considers her a representative of the Famus society, hostile to him. Chatsky decided to leave Moscow forever. Why? Leaving "the tormentors of the crowd, in the love of traitors, in the enmity of the indefatigable", he intends to "seek around the world where there is a corner for the offended feeling."

And Sophia? After all, it was possible to reconcile with her! But Chatsky, reckoning her to the world of his enemies, is convinced that "there will be another well-behaved crook and businessman." Maybe our hero is right. After all, Sophia, brought up in the spirit of hatred for everything progressive, new, would not bring happiness to a person who has a definite opinion about serfdom, education, service. No wonder the Decembrists saw in Chatsky their like-minded person.

I admit, I feel sorry for Sophia, because she is not a bad girl, not immoral, but, unfortunately, she turned out to be a victim of the lies that are typical for the Famus society that ruined her. Chatsky is a representative of that part of the noble youth who is already aware of all the inertia of the surrounding reality, all the insignificance and emptiness of the people who surround him. There are still a few such people, they are not yet capable of fighting the existing system, but they appear - this is the trend of the times. That is why Chatsky can rightly be called a hero of his time. It was these people who came to Senate Square on December 14, 1825. Chatsky is a man of extraordinary intelligence, brave, honest, sincere. In his disputes with Famusov, in his critical judgments, the appearance of a person who sees the vices and contradictions of his society and wants to fight them (so far in a word) looms.

Griboyedov shows these qualities especially vividly, opposing Chatsky with the low toady and hypocrite Molchalin. This vile man, who has nothing sacred, regularly fulfills his father's covenant "to please all people without exception", even "to the janitor's dog, so that it is affectionate." Molchalin is "a low-flyer and a businessman," as Chatsky characterizes him.

Famusov - a high-ranking official, a conservative to the marrow of his bones, a stupid martinet and obscurantist Skalozub - these are the people whom Chatsky meets. In these characters, Griboyedov gave an accurate and vivid description of the noble society of that time.

In the musty Famus world, Chatsky appears like a cleansing thunderstorm. He is in everything opposite to the typical representatives of the Famus society. If Molchalin, Famusov, Skalozub see the meaning of life in their well-being ("bureaucrats, shtetls"), then Chatsky dreams of selfless service to the fatherland, of benefiting the people he respects and considers "smart and vigorous". At the same time, he despises blind servility, servility, and careerism. He "would be glad to serve," but he was "sickening to be served." Chatsky sharply criticizes this society, mired in hypocrisy, hypocrisy, debauchery. He says bitterly:

Where, show us, fathers of the fatherland,

Which should we take as samples?

Are not these rich in robbery?

Found protection from fate in friends, in kinship,

Magnificent building chambers,

Where they overflow in feasts and prodigality...

These people are deeply indifferent to the fate of their homeland and people. Their cultural and moral level can be judged by such remarks by Famusov: "Take away all the books and burn them," because "scholarship is the reason" that "crazy divorced people, and deeds, and opinions." Chatsky has a different opinion, he appreciates people who are ready "to put a mind in science, hungry for knowledge", or to engage in art "creative, high and beautiful."

Chatsky rebels against the society of famous, skalozubovyh, silent. But his protest is too weak to shake the foundations of this society. Tragic is the conflict between the young hero and his milieu, where love, friendship, every strong feeling, every living thought is doomed to persecution. He is declared insane, they turn away from him. "Who was with! Where fate threw me! Everyone is chasing! Everyone is cursing!" "Get out of Moscow! I don't come here anymore," Chatsky exclaims sadly.

In the comedy, Chatsky is lonely, but there are more and more people like him (remember the cousin Skalozub, whom he "followed the rank", and he suddenly left the service, began to read books in the village, or the nephew of Princess Tugoukhovskaya - "chemist and botanist"). It was they who were to carry out the first stage of the revolutionary liberation movement, stir up the country, bring closer the moment when the people will be freed from the chains of slavery, when those principles of just social relations that Chatsky, Griboyedov himself, and the Decembrists dream of will triumph.

The comedy "Woe from Wit" entered the treasury of our national culture. Even now it has not lost its moral and artistic power. We, the people of the new generation, understand and are close to Griboedov's angry, implacable attitude towards injustice, meanness, hypocrisy, which are so often encountered in our lives. Woe from crazy (1)Composition >> Literature and Russian language

... « Woe from crazy" from crazy” is one of the brightest works... characters of accusatory monologues Chatsky: “Nestor... about their arbitrariness on towards peasants... characteristic off-stage characters in the comedy by A. S. Griboyedov “ Woe from crazy”.

Alexander Andreevich Chatsky is the main character in the play "Woe from Wit" by Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov. Chatsky is one of the most famous characters in Russian plays. Griboyedov did not try to make this hero, like everyone else in this work, completely positive or negative. He put both good and bad qualities into it, approaching realism.

Chatsky is young in the play, but is no longer a boy. His parents died early, and he was brought up by a friend of his father, Famusov. The young man belongs to the family of hereditary nobles. At the moment, Chatsky has three or four hundred souls. He was brought up with Famusov's daughter Sofya. She was his best friend, whom Alexander fell in love with. When Chatsky grew up, he decided to live separately, explaining that he was bored in the house of a friend of his father. He later went on a trip for three years to gain further knowledge. Before that, he was in the service, but left due to the fact that he did not like serving people. He believed that another time had come and it was necessary to destroy the old foundations.

Alexander Andreevich is a smart and capable person. Everyone believes that he would have achieved a lot by remaining in the service. Chatsky is also a witty person, but sometimes he can be sarcastic. After a trip abroad, he ceased to understand the foundations of Russia (serve people, make a laughing stock of himself in order to please superiors). The young man recognized service only in the manifestation of himself in work, using his abilities and knowledge. He openly laughed at Famusov and the people around him, realizing that this offended them. Chatsky condemned the stupidity of this people.

Immediately after arrival, without stopping home, Alexander went to Sophia. At the meeting, he found out that she had long been in love with another - Alexei Stepanovich Molchalin - and called her former relationship with Alexander "childish pranks." Stepan was not like Chatsky. He was not stupid, smart in his own way. Molchalin belonged to the type of people who serve and achieve success in their careers due to their cunning. Therefore, he and "Molchalin". Because of this, Sophia chose him (she would never be with Chatsky). Sophia did not like Alexander's mocking appeal to her and started a rumor that Chatsky was crazy, which quickly spread in society.

Upon learning of this, the young man fled from that place. Where? This can only be guessed at. Maybe he fled to people like him, wanting a revolution. After all, Griboyedov expressed his thoughts through Chatsky, and the writer had Decembrist friends. And he himself was suspected of participating in the plans of the Decembrists.

Essay about Chatsky

Griboedov's work "Woe from Wit" reflects the conflict of political views of a conservative society with people of a new generation and new trends. Comedy reflected this problem vividly, bitingly with the satirical power and wit inherent in this genre.

Chatsky is the only person of the new generation who opposes the conservative majority. Obviously, the play "from and to" is dedicated to the ideas of Decembrism. Here is the patriotic mood of Chatsky, and loud statements in defense of science and education, and critical remarks about serfdom, as well as the idea of ​​the identity of the Russian people, the features of Russian national culture.

Interestingly, the main character of the work is, in essence, the embodiment of the author, his ideas and passions. Chatsky traveled the world for a long time, as a result of which he was inspired by the ideas of equality, fraternity and individual freedom. But returning to his homeland, the hero sees that nothing around has changed, people have remained the same. In Famusov's house, Chatsky's arrival is not welcome, and the main character immediately notices this. He sees that society in the country is built on hypocrisy and deceit, and the main occupations of the Moscow nobility are endless festivities, dances and feasts.

Chatsky belongs to the nobility, is not rich, at one time refused military service. He explained his act by saying that he did not see any benefit in this matter and that he would be glad to serve, and not be served.

Chatsky confronts the inhabitants of the Famusov's house: Skalozub, Molchalin, Repetilov and Famusov himself. In the comedy, the author ridicules and condemns these people as representatives of the secular society of that time.

The reason for the return of the protagonist to his homeland was his boundless love for Sophia. Once in Moscow, he immediately goes to Famusov's house and confesses his feelings to the girl. According to this act, Chatsky can be characterized as a passionate, passionate and romantic person. Love for him is the highest feeling, a shrine. What pain he has to experience when he finds out that Sophia loves Molchalin.

Chatsky is educated, has a subtle, sharp mind and resourcefulness. But all these qualities did not seem to be noticed by others, and only the maid Lisa was able to note them in a conversation with Sophia. But she did not pay any attention to the words of the girl.

The protagonist sharply condemns serfdom, which called them a source of misfortune. He despises the Moscow "aces", for whom the ideal of life is wealth and career growth. Chatsky notes the inability of the older generation to defend their position and express their opinion.

In the confrontation with the Famus society, the hero suffers a terrible defeat: Sophia prefers him to Molchalin, society does not accept him and ridicules him. Shaken by these circumstances, Chatsky leaves the city. According to I.A. Goncharov, Chatsky was broken by the quantitative superiority of the "old force", but he himself dealt it a crushing blow with the quality of the force of the new generation.

Option 3

Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" is dotted with various negative characters. Heroes who cause disrespect, contempt and even anger for their actions, words and thoughts. The antagonist of all bad heroes is Alexander Andreyevich Chatsky.

Nowadays, American films based on comics and all kinds of action films are very popular, where one hero fights with a dozen opponents. Chatsky is the prototype of such a hero in Russian literature, only he fights not physically, but spiritually.

Alexander Andreevich possesses the best human qualities: honesty, dignity, honor, courage, intelligence, wit. When he returns to Moscow to meet the love of his life, Sophia, he comes into great shock, because the girl he loves is now cold with him, and the society that has formed around her father amazes Chatsky with his stupidity, naivety, admiration for everything foreign, hypocrisy and absurdity of their reflections. What is only one Skalozub who claims that books have a bad effect on people.

Seeing this whole circus in the face of Famusov's society, our hero decides to fight him, to prove to Sophia that their love is still alive. He traveled for three years, but his love did not pass. He lived all his childhood and youth in the Famusovs' house, and he remembers perfectly how much fun he had then. Now the golem of absurdity rose before him, representing the society of the Famusovs' house.

At the ball, he never hesitates to tell everyone present in the face how ignorant they are, how petty their life is, how pitiful their admiration for foreigners, how unworthy they behave. People, being a huge mass, and because of this having great power of public opinion, agree that Chatsky has gone crazy, and this idea is like a bullet flying through society.

Chatsky is a foreign body in the stomach, which is saturated with hypocrisy and depravity. The organ, poisoned and drunk with the fashion of society, is trying to spew out a foreign body from itself, the Famusov society, led by the owner of the house, is trying to make Chatsky an abnormal person, because everything that contradicts their laws is abnormal, but they do not admit that this is not Chatsky superfluous in this organ, it would be worth cutting out the stomach itself, like a festering wound, because it does not bring any benefit, but rather has a detrimental effect on the entire organism, which is called Russia.

Sample 4

The work “Woe from Wit” shows us the struggle between the old and the new, which was widely unfolding in Russia at that time between people with the views of the Decembrists and gentlemen. A rich society dominated by Famusov and his other like-minded people is opposed in the comedy by Chatsky.

We see that Chatsky's worldview took place during a period of upswing. He grew up in Famusov's house as an inquisitive, sociable and vulnerable little boy. The monotony of the established way of life, the spiritual poverty of the Moscow aristocracy caused him longing and complete disgust. He was completely immersed in freedom-loving thoughts about how to reorganize the old society, and therefore did not visit the house where he grew up at all. Even Sophia noticed it. After all, Chatsky leaves in his youth, leaving the girl, in order to travel and at the same time enrich his mind.

Sophia, of course, had passionate feelings for him, but could not understand how the young man risked personal happiness for the sake of the common good. Limited in worldviews does not allow her to appreciate the image of Chatsky at its true worth. But, the young man did not reject Sophia's feelings at all. He set spiritual demands more than personal ones. Returning to Moscow, the flame of his love is full of hopes for reciprocity. However, over time, the girl has changed. A reasonable, serious girl, having read romantic works, is looking for the same sincere love as Chatsky. She soberly evaluates empty phrases and Skalozub's limited horizons. Molchalin, on the other hand, seems to be only a sweet and impressionable young man. And if Sophia falls in love with him, then she will automatically join the Famus society.

Chatsky directly assesses the character of Molchalin, which offends the girl. But the exact statements addressed to the heroes of the play and the sharp mind seem to Sofya to be the young man's disdain for people. And when a girl evaluates Molchalin at the beginning, this gives some hope to Chatsky. But then, having learned that Sophia nevertheless preferred an opponent as a wife, she greatly offends him. Our hero suffers from the fact that he was humiliated by putting him next to Molchalin. We see how Chatsky mercilessly rips off the masks of duplicity and meanness from the representatives of a secular society, which is mired in intrigue and entertainment, debauchery and corruption. Our hero is represented by a humanist. He believes that people should strive for the best. And there are heroes like him. Chatsky spoke about that advanced youth, which, albeit in small numbers, began to put forward advanced ideas. And, despite the fact that the character is defeated by Famusov and his supporters, his image is perceived from a positive point of view. After all, such people always exist, where there is a struggle between the old generation and the new.

Alexander Andreevich Chatsky is the main male character of the comedy. He was left an orphan quite early, and was brought up in the house of his father's friend, Famusov. Together with the daughter of the patron he received an excellent education. Over time, his friendship with Sophia grew into love. He sincerely admired her and wanted to marry her.

Chatsky is a very honest and active person. He got bored, and he went to travel, to see the world. Famusov could not instill his worldview in Chatsky. Upon his return, Chatsky realized that society remained the same. Chatsky lives

future, has a negative attitude towards the cruelty of the landowners and serfdom. Chatsky is a fighter for a just society and dreams of benefiting the people. He criticizes people who are engaged in careerism, he believes that "you need to serve the cause, not the person." And although Chatsky is very smart, as Famusov noted: “he is small with a head, and writes and translates nicely,” but he went to serve in the army.

Chatsky is a proud, direct and noble person who always expresses his opinion. It is difficult for him to live in an immoral society. He greatly experiences disappointment in his beloved and her betrayal, and understands that he has no place among people who live in lies and meanness.

Other works on this topic:

1. The characters of Chatsky and Molchalin are opposed to each other. Chatsky is undoubtedly the main character of the comedy, because it is with his appearance that events begin to unfold in Famusov's house. Chatsky...
2. Chatsky - winner or loser? After reading the tragedy of Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov “Woe from Wit”, it is difficult to say who the main character Chatsky turned out to be: a winner or a loser. In that...
3. Chatsky and the Famus Society In the satirical comedy by Alexander Sergeevich Griboedov, a noble society of the 10-20s of the 19th century is described. The protagonist of the work Alexander Andreyevich Chatsky is a young,...
4. “Woe from Wit” by A. S. Griboyedov became for his contemporaries one of the mysterious works of Russian literature. Staged in 1825, the play collected a lot of reviews. BUT....
5. Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov is one of the main characters of the comedy. If the surname Famusov is translated from Latin, it will mean “famous, famous”. Famusov lives in...
6. Chatsky comes to Moscow, hoping for great changes that have taken place in society, and the remaining Sophia. But it turns out to be in a completely different situation. Sophia turned everything past...
7. Petrushka Petrushka is one of the secondary characters in Griboedov's comedy "Woe from Wit"; servant and bartender in the house of Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov. It's almost invisible and...
8. The main theme of the play "Woe from Wit" is the conflict of a strong personality with the philistine views of the surrounding society. This is most clearly shown in the example of the Famusov's house. In silence...
9. Griboedov's immortal comedy is based on the struggle of an advanced man of his time with the old world. The protagonist openly expresses his disagreement and contempt for the ancient, obsolete...

Chatsky is a young free man; one might say, a traveler, a seeker of the new. He’s not rich, he doesn’t have any rank, and he doesn’t need him for anything: “I would be glad to serve, it’s sickening to serve,” he says to Famusov when he calls to serve Chatsky if he wants to marry Sophia. Chatsky is smart, witty, says only what is in his heart - and this is his hallmark. I even dare to compare him with Khlestakov: "What's on the mind, then on the tongue."

Chatsky is a man of new times, advanced views, a man of a different kind:

“Your age I scolded mercilessly!” -

He exposes the current age, the time in which he lives and, most importantly, is not afraid to do so. In this regard, the question arises: "Who else, if not him?". “There is no warrior alone in the field,” says folk wisdom. But in this case, a warrior is a warrior if he is Chatsky!

This is true; he is a doctor, a doctor of freedom. He is trying to make sure that he is understood - he does not accept the current system, as I said. But the fact is that no one understands him, and cannot understand him, and they take him for a madman. Chatsky himself says to Famusov and Skalozub:

“Houses are new, but prejudices are old;
Rejoice, they will not exterminate
Neither their years, nor fashion, nor fires "-

Here it is, the problem! But does Chatsky himself understand that all his appeals, all exhortations, all his strength, all that caustic mind that he put into his words - does he understand that all this ... as if in vain? He knows that it is not in vain, because it is not the present age, not these people who will understand him, but others will surely understand him.

In the comedy, Chatsky is the most significant character in terms of his function, because without him nothing would have happened: the Famus society would have remained Famus society, or changed slightly due to new trends, as is usually the case.

Throughout the comedy, Chatsky earned many characterizations about himself. Here are some of them.

I. Lisa about Chatsky:

1) “Who is so sensitive, and cheerful, and sharp,
Like Alexander Andreevich Chatsky!

II. Sofia Pavlovna about Chatsky:

1) (D. I, I. 5)

“... He is nice
He knows how to laugh at everyone;
Chatting, joking, it's funny to me;
Laughter can share with anyone.

2) (Also D., also me.)

“Sharp, smart, eloquent.
I'm especially happy with friends."

3) (Also D., I 6) Sophia, angry with Chatsky's words about Molchalin:

"Not a man, a snake!"

4) (D. II, I. 8)

“Deadly by their coldness!
To look at you, I have no strength to listen to you.

5) (Also D., also I.)

“What are you to me?
Yes, it’s true, not your troubles - fun for you,
Kill your own father - it doesn't matter.

6) (Also D., I. 9)

“Ah, Alexander Andreevich, here,
You appear quite generous:
To the misfortune of your neighbor, you are so not indifferent.

7) (Also D., I. 11)

“... I’m afraid that I won’t be able to withstand the pretense.
Why did God bring Chatsky here!

8) A fundamental characterization from Sophia Chatsky receives in III D., 1 phenomenon:

"Your gaiety is not modest,
Your sharpness is ready at once,
And you yourself…”

“... a menacing look and a sharp tone,
And these features in you abyss,
And above a thunderstorm is far from useless "-

With this, Sophia reproaches Chatsky for being too frank. She, perhaps, believes that Chatsky himself does not see these “features of the abyss” - these, according to Sophia, are the strongest shortcomings. She encourages Chatsky to fight them. But are these disadvantages? Only in the opinion of the Famus society, but not in the opinion of Chatsky.

“It is noticeable that you are ready to pour out bile on everyone;
And I, so as not to interfere, will evade from here.

“Why should I be, I’ll tell you bluntly,
So I will not restrain my tongue,
In contempt for people so openly,
That there is no mercy even for the humblest! .. What?
Happen to someone to call him:
A hail of your barbs and jokes will break out.
Tell jokes! and a century to joke! how you will become!”

Alluding to Chatsky:

“Of course, he doesn’t have this mind
What a genius for others, and for others a plague,
Which is quick, brilliant and soon opposes,
Which light scolds on the spot,
So that the world at least says something about him,
Will such a mind make a family happy?

9) (D. III, I. 14)

"Oh, this man is always
Cause me a terrible disorder!
I'm glad to humiliate, prick; envious, proud and angry!

"He is not quite all there"

“Not really…”

"BUT! Chatsky, you love to dress up everyone in jesters,
Would you like to try it on yourself?"

III. Chatsky about himself:

1) (D. I, I. 7)

“Listen, are my words all the pegs?
And tend to someone's harm?
But if so, the mind and heart are not in harmony.
I'm in weirdo to another miracle
Once I laugh, then I forget ... "

2) (Also D., I. 9)

"Oh! no, I'm a little spoiled by hopes"

"I'm not a dream teller"

"I believe my own eyes"

3) (D. II, I. 7)

“It is not my desire to prolong disputes ...”

4) (D. III, I. 1)

“I myself? isn't it funny?"

“I am strange, but who is not strange?
The one who looks like all the fools ... "

“But is there in him * (in Molchalin) * that passion,
That feeling, that fervor,
So that besides you he has a whole world
Was it dust and vanity?
So that every beat of the heart
Has love accelerated towards you?
So that thoughts were everything and all his deeds
Soul - you, pleasing to you? .. "

"Oh! My God! Am I one of those
To whom the purpose of all life is laughter?
I'm happy when I meet funny people
And most of the time I miss them."

5) (D. IV, I. ​​10)

"Am I really crazy?"

6) (Also D., I. 14)

"Blind man! In whom I sought the reward of all labors!

IV. Famusov about Chatsky

1) (D. I, I. 10)

“... this dandy friend;
Notorious wasted, tomboy;
What's the commission, creator
To be a father to an adult daughter!

2) (D. II, I. 2)

“That’s it, you are all proud!
Would you ask how the fathers did?
We would learn by looking at the elders ... "

"Oh! My God! he's carbonari!"

"Dangerous man!"

“What does he say! and speaks as he writes!

“He wants to preach liberty!”

“Yes, he does not recognize the authorities!”

“And I don’t want to know you, I don’t tolerate debauchery.”

“Here they roam the world, they beat the buckets,
They come back, expect order from them.

3) (D. II, I. 3)

"You'll be kicked
Under court, they will give you how to drink.

4) (D. II, I. 4)

“... Andrey Ilyich, the late son:
Does not serve, that is, he does not find any benefit in that,
It's a pity, it's a pity, he's small with a head,
And he writes and translates well.”

5) (D. III, I. 21)

“For a long time I wonder how no one will tie him up!
Try about the authorities, and no one will say anything!
Bow a little low, bend over with a ring,
Even before the monastic face,
So he will call a scoundrel! .. "

“I went after my mother, after Anna Aleksevna:
The dead woman went crazy eight times.”

6) (D. IV, I. ​​15)

"Insane! what the hell is he talking about here!
Worshiper! father-in-law! and about Moscow is so menacing!”

V. Other persons about Chatsky:

1) (D. III, I. 10), Khlestova:

“... What is he happy about? What's the laugh?
Laughing at old age is a sin ... "
“I was tearing at his ears, only a little.”

2) (D. III, I. 15 and 16), G. N. and G. D.:

"Crazy!"

3) (D. III, I. 16), Zagoretsky:

“... He was hidden in the insane by his rogue uncle ...
They seized me, into a yellow house, and put me on a chain.
So, they let them off the chain, ”

"He's crazy"

Countess granddaughter:

“Imagine, I noticed myself;
And at least bet, you are with me in one word.

(I. 19) Zagoretsky:

"In the mountains he was wounded in the forehead, went crazy from the wound."

(I. 20) Countess grandmother:

“Yes! .. he is in pusurmans!
Oh! cursed Voltairian!"

(I. 21) Khlestova:

"He pulled champagne glasses."

Famusov:

"Learning is the plague, learning is the cause..."

4) (D. IV, I. ​​7), Princess:

“... it’s dangerous to talk to them,
It's time to ban...
…
I think he's just a Jacobin..."

According to Famusov, and, I think, according to the entire Famus society, Chatsky is a perverted person; and his perversion is expressed in this: in speech, in actions - in everything, and he is perverted by that, that he sees all the injustice, unrighteousness, precisely the very perversion of Famus' society. What dares, moreover, to express his opinion. "He's carbonari!" Famusov exclaims. “He is a Jacobin,” says the princess. And no matter how they call Chatsky, but everyone comes to the conclusion ... more precisely, Sophia came to the conclusion, and then as a joke, in revenge, and the rest of society agreed with this conclusion - in general, Chatsky went crazy. But this is not so - and we know it very well. He was simply smarter than his time, he was ahead of him and fought with the old orders, exposing them in a sophisticated and cunning way ... He opposed himself to the whole society; he fought with him...in the end, he comes to the conclusion that only time will change these people. Then he leaves to wander - again:

“Get out of Moscow! I don't come here anymore.
I'm running, I won't look back, I'll go looking around the world,
Where there is a corner for the offended feeling!
Carriage for me, carriage!”

But what did Chatsky leave behind, what did he change? After all, Famus society has remained Famus society! Or has he planted a seed, a seed of freedom that will soon bear fruit?
Chatsky, being a sensitive and, moreover, a witty person, uttered all sorts of “barbs”, accused the Famus society for not being able to understand him, for not wanting to change, and that it mocked him. He tried on a special role - the role of a judge, an exposer of vices, of all this injustice that is piling up and surrounding this whole society. So has anything changed? It is impossible to answer this question, just as it is impossible to answer the question: “Will this person be a talented poet? - and the person has not yet been born; has not yet grown - it is still only in its infancy ...

Comedy A.S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit" provided the author, without any doubt, true immortality through the ages. The protagonist of the work, Alexander Andreyevich Chatsky, became one of the most controversial and famous literary figures of the "Golden Age" of Russian literature. It was about him, who opens a whole gallery of images of the so-called "superfluous people", the brightest representative of which will be Pushkin's Eugene Onegin, that criticism was extremely ambiguous.

The story of a progressive-minded young man told on the pages of the play, who faced misunderstanding on the part of the conservative aristocracy, is imprisoned by Griboyedov in a traditional interpersonal love conflict, which, however, is only one of the most superficial problems in comedy.

The main conflict, as already mentioned, is the confrontation between the “current century” and the “past century”. It is worth referring to a well-known fact to confirm this assumption: the initially skillful diplomat A.S. Griboedov, who created his epoch-making work during the years of the deployment of various kinds of secret organizations that united the progressive people of his time, called the comedy "Woe to the mind."

Later, in his diaries, he would write: "In my comedy there are twenty-five fools for one sane person." So, here the conflict becomes obvious, which the author himself put, as they say, at the forefront: the protagonist of "Woe from Wit" is opposed to a traditional society, whose life is completely saturated with falsehood, stupidity; its values ​​are scanty and empty, it rejects everything new, rational.

Alexander Andreevich turns out to be a foreign body in Famusov's house. His fault lies in the fact that he boldly and directly expresses his own opinion, which runs counter to the orders of the conservative aristocracy. “I would be glad to serve, it’s sickening to serve,” he remarks in response to the monologue of Famusov Sr., advising Chatsky to earn a rank. The hero is alien to the morals of the insincere and stupid "high society", where dubious etiquette rules the ball.

Chatsky is amazingly smart; his speech is witty, sharp and frank. And if at first it arouses interest, then later, realizing that it will not be possible to come to an agreement with this most educated fighter for justice, for honesty, for the mind, the society rejects the hero, declaring him crazy. This is the amazing drama of this immortal comedy.

For Alexander Andreyevich, who returned to Moscow after three years of wandering around Europe and having been nourished by the progressive ideas of that time, the picture of the life of the Moscow world becomes especially transparent. He frankly opposes servility, bribery, protectionism that prevails in the public service.

He accepts only service "to the cause, not to persons" - and this contradicts the beliefs of the representatives of the "past century." In addition, the hero opposes serfdom and even talks about an advanced landowner who freed the peasants from the burden of slave labor. This off-stage hero, who is only mentioned once in the story, turns out to be a kind of “double” of Chatsky - and, alas, in the story about his fate, Griboyedov anticipates the outcome of the main character’s activities: he is considered an eccentric and shunned.

Chatsky has his own opinion on everything and - he is ready to defend it. This open, sincere and self-confident character evaluates people not by their position in society, but by their actions, inner qualities.

In a society in which the main character sees absolutely nothing positive and pleasant, he is kept only by love for Sofya Famusova. At the same time, it is interesting that Chatsky himself behaves selfishly in many respects: he leaves his beloved for several years alone, without leaving a warning about his departure, and then returns completely unexpectedly - and behaves with the heroine as if there were no three years of separation.

Chatsky mistakenly considers Sophia's worldview close to his own, not realizing that she, unlike him, was not trained in the same way as he was, was not imbued with freedom-loving ideas. On the contrary, this girl, who had every chance of becoming close to Chatsky in spirit, is not for nothing that she is Sophia, i.e. "wise" - mired in the life of the Moscow world more than anyone else. Therefore, the heroine with a speaking name bears a "conservative" surname - Famusova. It is she who dooms Alexander Andreevich to the reputation of a madman.

Thus, Chatsky is defeated both on the public and on the love front. The drama, grief of the character lies not only in the conflict of his beliefs with the life order of the traditional aristocracy, but also in his absolute inability to accept the differences in the worldview of other people, in the misunderstanding of the motives of other people's actions and the rejection of the awareness of his own mistakes.