Brief biography of D. I. Fonvizin: the most important and basic things about life and work. The life and creative path of Fonvizin The last years of his life

Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin - Russian writer and publicist, playwright and translator during the reign of Catherine the Great, founder domestic comedy, who worked in such literary direction like classicism. The life and work of this man made an invaluable contribution to the development of Russian literature.

Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin was born on April 3, 1745 and grew up in a noble family in Moscow. His family went back to German roots, so his surname is a Russian variation of the German name Von Wisin.

Initially, the future genius was educated at home, and then was enrolled in the list of students of the Faculty of Philosophy at Moscow University. Afterwards, for his services in the literary field, he will be sent to St. Petersburg, where he met such iconic figures states like Lomonosov, Sumarokov.

Creative path: a success story

The first works began to appear already in 1760. The writer began with translations, which were published periodically. The first landmark publication was in the form of an early version of the famous play “The Minor.” Later, by 1781, the completed play will be staged on the stage of St. Petersburg, and two years later it will occupy the stages of Moscow. 8 years later, from the pen of the classicist, a comedy with a satirical orientation called “The Brigadier” came out, which elevated Fonvizin as a writer and was honored to be read before the Empress herself in her Peterhof summer house.

Like many writers, Fonvizin spent a lot of time abroad, in particular in France. His work as an adviser to the chancellery was accompanied by the writing of a large number of journalistic texts, for example, “Discourse on the Indispensable Laws of State,” as well as work on translations that allowed the Russian reader to become acquainted with the works of Rousseau, Ovid and even Walter.

Personal life

Little is known about the writer’s personal life. His wife's name was Katerina Ivanovna Rogovikova, she was from the family of a wealthy merchant. There is no mention of children in his biography.

It is only known that he was an exemplary family man, therefore all his works are edifying in nature. In matters of family and marriage, he was categorical: a woman is decorated with fidelity, piety and education, and a man is decorated with virtue, strength and wisdom.

last years of life

In the last years of his life, spending time traveling abroad in Europe, the writer encountered a disease that was too tough for the medicine of those years. The first apoplectic gift will suffice him, because of which he will be forced to return to Russia.

FONVIZIN Denis Ivanovich - the famous Russian writer - came from the Russified Baltic nobles (von-Vizin). F. spent his childhood in a patriarchal environment in the house of his father, an official of the revision board. He received his education at the university gymnasium and at the Faculty of Philosophy of Moscow University. After graduating from university, F. entered a foreign college as a translator, but already in 1763 he began serving as an official under the cabinet minister Elagin. From 1769 to 1783 F. served with gr. Panina P.I., in the Collegium of Foreign Affairs as a secretary. In 1785 F. suffered from paralysis.

F. was an educational humanist of the second half of the 18th century. An admirer of Voltaire, Rousseau, F. was an enemy of autocratic despotism. F. rose to the idea that “it is illegal to oppress one’s own kind through slavery.” Throughout his life, F. carried hostility towards the secular society, the royal court, court nobles, and temporary workers. F. was an enemy of ignorance, a fighter for culture, an admirer of Peter’s reforms, who advocated the assimilation of Western European culture, but at the same time fought against blind imitation of foreign things. Fonvizin knew very well purely folk speech and skillfully used it: the Russian folk language, sharp folk words, sayings gave strength the best works Fonvizina.

F.'s literary activity began when he was still a student at Moscow University. In 1761, he translated Golberg's fables from German, then a number of moralizing satirical works by Voltaire and others. In 1762, F. moved to St. Petersburg and here he developed intensive literary activity. He was a regular guest of Kozlovsky's circle. As a result of his rapprochement with this circle, F. wrote “Epistle to the Servants,” in which he revealed religious skepticism and gave a sharp characterization of the clergy. Although F.'s departure from atheistic views was later noticed, he forever remained an enemy of clericalism, religious obscurantism, and all kinds of superstition. In 1764, F. made his first independent dramatic work, the comedy Corion. A few years after “Corion,” the social comedy “Brigadier” appears.

Fox-schemer

In the fable genre, Fonvizin was a follower of Sumarokov. National morals and characters, precise details and signs of everyday life, colloquial speech with the frequent use of common words and expressions are found in his fables. Only Fonvizin is more daring and radical than his predecessor. The fable “The Fox-Koznodey” is aimed at clever and shameless sycophants-officials who support the powers that be with flattering speeches and servile behavior. And they have considerable personal benefit from this. The work is about a certain “Libyan side”, which, however, is very reminiscent of Russian reality. Not shy about outright lies, the Fox praises Leo. In addition to the Fox, there are two more characters in the fable: the Mole and the Dog. These are much more frank and honest in their assessments of the late king. However, they won’t tell the truth out loud; They whisper in each other's ears.

Descriptions of the lion's rule are given in tones of invective, that is, angry denunciation. The king's throne was built "from the bones of torn animals." The inhabitants of the Libyan side are skinned by the royal favorites and nobles without trial or investigation. Out of fear and despair, the Elephant leaves the Libyan forest and hides in the steppe. The clever builder Beaver is ruined by taxes and falls into poverty. But the fate of the court artist is shown especially expressively and in detail. He is not only skilled in his craft, but also masters new painting techniques. Alfresco is painting with water paints on the damp plaster of the walls of dwellings. All his life, the court painter devotedly served the king and nobles with his talent. But he also dies in poverty, “from melancholy and hunger.”

“The Fox-Koznodey” is a bright and impressive work not only in terms of the bold ideas stated here, but also in terms of their artistic embodiment. The technique of antithesis works especially clearly: contrasting the flattering speeches of the Fox with the truthful and bitter assessments given by the Mole and the Dog. It is the antithesis that emphasizes and makes the author's sarcasm so deadly.

Brigadier

Denis Fonvizin began writing the five-act comedy “Brigadier” in the first days of his stay in Moscow in the winter of 1768. In the spring of 1769, Denis Ivanovich mentioned it in his letter to the Russian statesman, poet and historian Ivan Elagin: “I almost finished my comedy.” In his next letter to the same addressee, Ivan Perfilyevich, Fonvizin again mentions the comedy, which, in all likelihood, has already been written to the final page.

All the playwright’s work on the comedy was related to the issues raised during the convening of the Commission for the drafting of the New Code. Denis Fonvizin was a supporter of those who, like the Russian philosopher and public figure Yakov Kozelsky, believed it was necessary, with the help of “righteous speeches,” to show a picture of Russian life. At the same time, the comedy raised the question of the method of creating a national comedy, posed in Elagin’s circle, in a new way.

Be that as it may, the first Russian national comedy “Brigadier” by Fonvizin is considered literary monument, which reflected the struggle of advanced Russian minds of the 18th century for the national originality of Russian culture. Denis Fonvizin in his comedy “The Brigadier” harshly ridiculed the servility of the contemporary Russian noble class to the French aristocracy.

Minor

The comedy “Minor” absorbed all the experience accumulated by Fonvizin, and in depth ideological issues, by the courage and originality found artistic solutions remains an unsurpassed masterpiece of Russian drama of the 18th century. The accusatory pathos of “The Minor” is fed by two powerful sources, equally dissolved in the structure of the dramatic action. Satire and journalism are lame.

Destructive and merciless satire fills all scenes depicting lifestyle Prostakova family. In the scenes of Mitrofan's teaching, in the revelations of his uncle about his love for pigs, in the greed and arbitrariness of the mistress of the house, the world of the Prostakovs and Skotinins is revealed in all the ugliness of their spiritual squalor.

An equally destructive verdict on this world is pronounced by the group of positive nobles present on stage, contrasted with the bestial existence of Mitrofan’s parents. Dialogues between Starodum and Pravdin. which touch upon deep, sometimes national problems, are passionate journalistic speeches reflecting author's position. The pathos of the speeches of Starodum and Pravdin also performs an accusatory function, but here the exposure merges with the affirmation of the positive ideals of the author himself.

Two problems that especially worried Fonvizin lie at the heart of “The Minor.” This is primarily the problem of the moral decay of the nobility. In the words of Starodum. indignantly denouncing the nobles, in whom nobility, one might say, was “buried with their ancestors,” in his reported observations from the life of the court, Fonvizin not only states the decline of the moral foundations of society, he seeks the reasons for this decline. The unlimited power of landowners over their peasants, in the absence of a proper moral example on the part of the highest authorities, became a source of arbitrariness; this led to the nobility forgetting their duties and the principles of class honor, that is, to the spiritual degeneration of the ruling class. In the light of Fonvizin’s general moral and political concept, the exponents of which in the play are positive characters, the world of simpletons and brutes appears as an ominous realization of the triumph of evil.

Another problem of “Minor” is the problem of education. Understood quite broadly, education in the minds of thinkers of the 18th century was considered as the primary factor determining the moral character of a person. In Fonvizin’s ideas, the problem of education acquired national significance, because the only reliable, in his opinion, source of salvation from the evil threatening society - the spiritual degradation of the nobility - was rooted in correct education. A significant part of the dramatic action in “The Minor” is, to one degree or another, subordinated to the problems of education.

A son of his time, Fonvizin, with all his appearance and the direction of his creative quest, belonged to that circle of advanced Russian people of the 18th century who formed the camp of enlighteners. All of them were writers, and their work is permeated with the pathos of affirming the ideals of justice and humanism. Satire and journalism were their weapons. Courageous protest against the injustices of autocracy and angry accusations against the serf owners were heard in their works. This was the historical merit of Russian satire of the 18th century, one of the most prominent representatives of which was Fonvizin.

Question No. 6. Odes of Derzhavin

Born on July 3 (14 NS) in the village of Karmachi, Kazan province, into a poor noble family. He studied at the Kazan gymnasium for three years (1759 - 62). From 1762 he served as a soldier in the Preobrazhensky Guards Regiment, which took part in palace coup, who elevated Catherine II to the throne.

In 1772 he was promoted to officer and took part in the suppression of the Pugachev uprising. Offended that his service was not appreciated and passed over with awards, he left for the civil service. He served briefly in the Senate, where he came to the conviction that “he couldn’t get along there, where they didn’t like the truth.”

In 1782 he wrote "Ode to Felitsa", addressed to the Empress, for which he received a reward from Catherine II - appointment as governor of Olonetsky (from 1784) and Tambovsky (1785 - 88). He made a lot of efforts to educate the Tambov region, tried to fight the bureaucracy, and defend justice.

Energetic, independent and direct, Derzhavin could not “get along” with high-ranking nobles, so his places of service often changed. In 1791 - 1793 he was the cabinet secretary of Catherine II, but, not pleasing her, he was dismissed from service; appointed senator, made many enemies because of his love of truth. In 1802 - 1803 he was Minister of Justice. At the age of sixty he retired.

Derzhavin began publishing in 1773, trying to follow the traditions of Lomonosov and Sumarokov, but from 1779 he “chose a completely different path.” He created his own style, which became a model philosophical lyrics: ode “On the death of Prince Meshchersky” (1799), ode “God” (1784) about the greatness of the universe and its Creator, about the place and purpose of man: “I am a king, I am a slave, I am a worm, I am god” ; "Autumn during the siege of Ochakov" (1788), "Waterfall" (1791 - 94), etc.

In the 1790s, Derzhavin created lyrical works"To the Lyre", "Praise of Rural Life". Derzhavin's aesthetic views are expressed in the treatise "Discourse on Lyric Poetry or Ode" (1811 - 15).

In the last years of his life, Derzhavin turned to drama, writing several tragedies: “Dobrynya”, “Pozharsky”, “Herod and Mariamne” and others.

St. Petersburg writers gathered in his house, and in 1811 the circle was formed into a government-approved literary society“Conversation of lovers of the Russian word”, in which Derzhavin took a special position. He treated Zhukovsky favorably and “noticed” young Pushkin. Derzhavin’s work prepared the ground for the poetry of Batyushkov, Pushkin, and the Decembrist poets.

Ode "On the death of Prince Meshchersky"(1779) brought Derzhavin fame. The poem is emotional, the mood of confusion and horror set in the first stanza is intensified by the end of the poem. The main thing in the poem: life and death, time and eternity. For example, time, inexorably bringing a person closer to death, is depicted in in the form of a clock. Death is an old woman with a scythe.

The tragic experience of death. It has plot contours. Prince Meshchersky, a close friend of the poet, died. His death was all the more striking because the whole life of the prince, “the son of luxury and bliss,” was “a holiday of beauty and contentment.” The drama of the death is greatly enhanced by the opposition of these poles. the entire figurative system of the work is in conflict. And this artistic conflict, underlying the structure of the ode, leads the reader to the idea of a contradictory dialectical essence of the universe that cannot be reduced to unity.

22.02.2019

Although the modern reader is separated from the era of Fonvizin by whole two centuries, it is difficult to find a person who would not know that a “junior” is an over-aged dropout, or would not have heard the remarks that have become proverbial: “I don’t want to study, but I want to get married,” “why geography?” “when there are cabbies” and other Fonvizin expressions.

Images, winged words and jokes from Fonvizin’s comedies “The Brigadier” and “The Minor” became part of our vocabulary. In the same way, Fonvizin’s ideas, which played an important role in the history of the liberation movement, were passed on from generation to generation.

Fonvizin belonged to a generation of young nobles who were educated at Moscow University, created on the initiative of Lomonosov. In 1755, he was assigned to the university gymnasium, which prepared its students for transfer to students, and studied there until 1762.

The university was the center of literary life in Moscow. One of the first activities of the university was the publication of Lomonosov's works; his students taught here - the poet and translator N. N. Popovsky, the philologist A. A. Barsov, and M. M. Kheraskov was in charge of publishing.

There was a theater at the university, the repertoire of which included translations by students of the gymnasium. Their literary exercises were eagerly published in the university magazines “Useful Fun” and “Collection best essays" It is not surprising that in addition to Fonvizin, many subsequently famous writers came out of the gymnasium - N. I. Novikov, F. A. Kozlovsky, the Karin brothers, A. A. Rzhevsky and others.

Fonvizin's first literary works were translations from German and French. He published translated articles in university journals and at the same time published as a separate book “Moral Fables” by the Danish educator and satirist L. Golberg (1761), and also began translating the multi-volume novel by J. Terrason “Heroic Virtue, or the Life of Seth, King of Egypt” (1762- 1768), whose hero was an ideal enlightened sovereign.

Terrason's educational and political ideas were positively assessed by French educators. Fonvizin also tries his hand at dramatic poetry, starting to translate Voltaire’s anti-clerical tragedy “Alzira”.

This list of works that interested the young writer testifies to his early interest in the ideas of the European Enlightenment. The liberal beginning of the reign of Catherine II aroused hopes among the advanced part of the nobility for the establishment of an “enlightened” monarchy in Russia.

At the end of 1762, Fonvizin left the university and was appointed as a translator at the College of Foreign Affairs. He stayed directly at the Collegium for only a year, and then was seconded to the office of the Empress Secretary of State I.P. Elagin.

Fonvizin's serious political education began in the capital. He was aware of various opinions about the proposed reforms, those disputes that preceded such important events in the history of Russian social thought as the competition of the Free Economic Society on the condition of the serfs (1766) and the convening of the Commission to draw up the New Code (1767). In these disputes, the ideology of the Russian Enlightenment was formed. Fonvizin added his voice to those who demanded political freedoms and the abolition of serfdom.

His social views in these years are illustrated by the manuscript “Abridgement of the freedom of the French nobility and the benefits of the third rank” and the translation of “The Merchant Nobility” by G.-F. Quaye with a foreword by the German lawyer I.-G. Justi, published in 1766.

Quaye's goal was to indicate how the degrading nobility could once again become a prosperous class. But Fonvizin was apparently attracted to the book primarily by the sharp criticism it contained of the nobles, who, in the name of class prejudices, neglected the interests of the state and nation, as well as by the idea that maintaining rigid class barriers was not in the interests of society.

It was this idea that he developed in a handwritten discussion about the establishment of the “third rank” in Russia, which meant the merchants, craftsmen and intelligentsia. The new “philistine” class was supposed to gradually be composed of serfs who had been freed and educated.

Thus, according to Fonvizin, gradually, peacefully, with the help of laws issued by an enlightened government, the abolition of serfdom, the enlightenment of society and the flourishing of civil life were achieved. Russia was becoming a country with a nobility “completely free”, a third rank, “completely liberated” and a people “practicing agriculture, although not completely free, but at least having the hope of being free.”

Later, creating the image of the nobleman Starodum in “The Minor,” an image to which the author’s thoughts and sympathies are given in this play, he will note that his hero made his fortune and achieved independence as an honest industrialist, and not as a sycophantic courtier. Fonvizin was among the first Russian writers who began to consistently destroy the class barriers of feudal society.

Fonvizin knew the Russian nobility too well to expect support from them in implementing the educational program. But he believed in the effectiveness of the propaganda of educational ideas, under the influence of which a new generation of honest sons of the fatherland was to be formed. As he believed, they would become assistants and support for an enlightened sovereign, whose goal would be the good of the fatherland and the nation.

Therefore, Fonvizin, a satirist by the nature of his talent, starting from his early works, also promotes the positive ideal social behavior. Already in the comedy “Corion” (1764) he attacked nobles who evade service, and in the words of one of the heroes declared:

Who has made every effort for the common good,

And he served for the glory of his fatherland,

He tasted direct joy in his life.

In this circle, the theory of “declining” foreign works “to Russian customs” was developed. Elagin was the first to apply the principle of “declension” in the play “Jean de Molay, or the Russian Frenchman,” borrowed from Golberg, and V. I. Lukin consistently formulated it in the prefaces to his comedies.

But his comedies turned out to be devoid of a sense of the comic and, most importantly, resisted the growing penetration of satire into all areas of literature, which a few years later led to the emergence of satirical journalism. Such private themes as a touching depiction of suffering virtue or the correction of a vicious nobleman did not in any way correspond to the political goals of Russian enlighteners, who raised the question of transforming society as a whole.

Close attention to human behavior in society allowed Fonvizin to understand more deeply than his contemporaries the foundations of Diderot's educational aesthetics. The idea of a satirical comedy about the Russian nobility took shape in an atmosphere of controversy surrounding the Commission for drawing up the New Code, where the majority of nobles came out in defense of serfdom. In 1769, “The Brigadier” was completed, and, turning to social satire, Fonvizin finally broke with the Elagin circle.

History of Russian literature: in 4 volumes / Edited by N.I. Prutskov and others - L., 1980-1983.

The famous writer of Catherine's era D.I. Fonvizin was born on April 3 (14), 1745 in Moscow, into a wealthy noble family. He came from a Livonian knightly family that had become completely Russified (until the mid-19th century, the surname was spelled Von-Wiesen). He received his primary education under the guidance of his father, Ivan Andreevich. In 1755-1760, Fonvizin studied at the newly opened gymnasium at Moscow University; in 1760 he was “promoted to student” at the Faculty of Philosophy, but stayed at the university for only 2 years.

A special place in the dramaturgy of this time is occupied by the work of Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin (1745-1792), which was the pinnacle of theatrical XVIII culture century. Inheriting the traditions of classicist comedy, Fonvizin goes far ahead, essentially being the founder of critical realism in Russian drama. A. S. Pushkin called the great playwright “a brave ruler of satire,” “a friend of freedom.” M. Gorky argued that Fonvizin began the most magnificent and, perhaps, the most socially fruitful line of Russian literature - the accusatory-realist line. Fonvizin's work had a tremendous influence on contemporary and subsequent writers and playwrights. D.I. Fonvizin joined the theater early. Theatrical impressions were the strongest in his youth: “... nothing in St. Petersburg delighted me so much as the theater, which I saw for the first time when I was a child. The effect the theater produced in me is almost impossible to describe.” While still a student, Fonvizin took part in the life of the Moscow University Theater. In the future, Denis Ivanovich maintains connections with the largest figures of the Russian theater - playwrights and actors: A. P. Sumarokov, I. A. Dmitrevsky and others, and appears with theatrical articles in satirical magazines. These magazines had a great influence on Fonvizin's work. From them he sometimes drew motives for his comedies. Fonvizin's dramatic activity began in the 60s. At first, he translates foreign plays and “transposes” them into the Russian style. But this was only a test of the pen. Fonvizin dreamed of creating a national comedy. "Brigadier" is Fonvizin's first original play. It was written in the late 60s. The simplicity of the plot did not prevent Fonvizin from creating a sharply satirical work, showing the morals and character of his narrow-minded heroes. Contemporaries called the play “The Brigadier” “a comedy about our morals.” This comedy was written under the influence of advanced satirical magazines and satirical comedies of Russian classicism and imbued with the author’s concern for the education of youth. “The Brigadier” is the first dramatic work in Russia, endowed with all the features of national originality, and in no way reminiscent of comedies created according to foreign standards. The language of comedy contains many popular expressions, aphorisms, and apt comparisons. This dignity of the “Brigadier” was immediately noticed by contemporaries, and the best of Fonvizin’s verbal turns were transferred to daily life, have become proverbial. The comedy “The Brigadier” was staged in 1780 at the St. Petersburg Theater on Tsaritsyn Meadow. The second comedy “The Minor” was written by D. I. Fonvizin in 1782. It brought the author long-lasting fame and placed him in the forefront of the fight against serfdom. The play explores the most important issues of the era. It talks about the education of underage noble sons and the morals of court society. But the problem of serfdom, evil and unpunished cruelty of landowners is posed more acutely than others. “The Minor” was created by the hand of a mature master, who managed to populate the play with living characters and build the action according to the signs of not only external, but also internal dynamics. The comedy “The Minor” absolutely did not meet the requirements of Catherine II, who ordered the writers to “only occasionally touch upon vices” and to conduct criticism without fail “in a smiling spirit.” On September 24, 1782, “The Minor” was staged by Fonvizin and Dmitrevsky at the theater on Tsaritsyn Meadow. The performance was a great success among the general public. On May 14, 1783, the premiere of “The Minor” took place on the stage of the Petrovsky Theater in Moscow. The premiere and subsequent performances were a huge success. “The Tutor's Choice”, a comedy written by Fonvizin in 1790, was dedicated to the burning topic of educating young people in aristocratic noble houses. The pathos of the comedy is directed against foreign adventurers-pseudo-teachers in favor of enlightened Russian nobles.

Books to read

Film adaptation of a classic

Biography of the writer

– playwright, publicist, translator.

Born April 3(14), 1745 in Moscow. He came from an old noble family (the Livonian knight von Wisin was captured under John IV , then began to serve the Russian Tsar). Since 1755, Denis Fonvizin was enrolled in the gymnasium at Moscow University, where he successfully studied Latin, German and French and gave speeches at ceremonial acts in Russian and German languages. In 1760, among the best students, Fonvizin was taken to St. Petersburgfor presentation to the curator of the university I.I. Shuvalov and “promoted to student.” He made his debut in the literary field as a translator: he translated from German a collection of the Danish writer Ludwig Golberg, popular in Europe.Moral fables (1761). Several minor translations by Fonvizin appeared in university publications in 1761–1762 (including in the journal M.M. Kheraskova “Useful entertainment”, where poems by Fonvizin’s older brother Pavel were also published); translation of the tragedy Voltaire Alzira (1762) was not published at the time, but became widespread in lists (published in 1894). At the same time, he began to translate a lengthy, four-volume adventure-didactic novel by Abbot Jean TerrasonHeroic Virtue, or the Life of Seth, King of Egypt, from Mysterious Evidence ancient egypt taken (1762–1768).

In 1762, Fonvizin left the university and became a translator at the College of Foreign Affairs. In 1763, after the coronation celebrations in Moscow, he moved with the court to St. Petersburg and until 1769 served under the State Councilor of the Palace Chancellery I.P. Elagin, who, being the manager of “court music and theater,” patronized aspiring writers. Fonvizin entered the so-called “Elagin circle”, whose participants (Elagin himself, V.I. Lukin, B.E. Elchaninov, etc. ) were busy developing original Russian comedy. For this purpose, foreign plays were remade, “bent” “to our morals” (i.e. names were changed characters, everyday realities, etc.). Lukin argued that the latter is necessary, since “many spectators do not receive any improvement in the morals of others from comedies. They think that it is not them, but strangers who are being ridiculed.” In addition, the circle mastered the traditions of the bourgeois “tearful drama” (otherwise known as “serious comedy”), of which he was the theoretician D. Diderot , i.e. a mixture of “funny” and “touching” in comedies was allowed. In this spirit, Fonvizin composed his first poetic comedyCorion (1764), based on the drama by the French author Jean-Baptiste-Louis GressetSydney . The action in it takes place in a village near Moscow and consists of a presentation of the sentimental story of lovers Corion and Xenovia, separated by a misunderstanding and happily united in the finale.Corion , however, was only a test of the pen of Fonvizin the playwright.

His comedy became a completely original and innovative work Brigadier (1768–1769, post. 1772, pub. 1786). This is the first “comedy of manners” in Russian literature, in contrast to the previously dominant satirical “comedy of characters”, when personified vices (“stinginess”, “bragging”, etc.) were brought to the stage. INForeman vices, peculiarities of speech and behavior of characters are socially conditioned. This is achieved with the help of “verbal masks”. Less speech characteristics there are no other, individual human traits left” (G.A. Gukovsky). “Talking” in comedy prevails over “action”: on stage they drink tea, play cards, discuss what books are needed for education, etc. The characters constantly “let slip” about themselves. Declarations of love (Adviser - Foreman, Foreman - Advisor) do not achieve their goal due to the fact that they speak, essentially, in different languages, i.e. a “dialogue of the deaf” emerges. What unites the negative characters of the comedy is their “stupidity”, shaded by the “prudence” of the positive ones - Sophia and Dobrolyubov, whose participation, however, is kept to a minimum (they say practically nothing and only scold everyone else as “brutes”). The figure of the “hallomaniac” Ivanushka is brought to the fore (the influence of Golberg’s comedy on the idea of “The Brigadier” was noted)Jean-French ), with which the most important topic for Fonvizin is the education of a nobleman.

In the 1760s, during the era of the Commission for drawing up the New Code (1767), Fonvizin spoke out on the issue of rights and privileges of the nobility that worried everyone. He translates the treatise by G.-F. Quayer Merchant nobility (1766), where the right of a nobleman to engage in industry and trade was justified (it is no coincidence inUnderage Starodum became rich as a Siberian industrialist, not a courtier). The manuscript distributed his compilation from the works of the German lawyer I.G. YustiAn abbreviation on the liberties of the French nobility and the benefits of the third rank (late 1760s). As an appendix to the story translated by Fonvizin by F.-T.-M.ArnoSidney and Scilly, or Beneficence and Gratitude (1769) one of his few poems was publishedMessage to my servants - Shumilov, Vanka and Petrushka (there are elements of anticlerical satire here, believed to be inspired by Fonvizin’s close communication with the writer F.A. Kozlovsky, a famous Voltairian and freethinker). Fonvizin’s activity as a translator of fiction was crowned by the translation of Paul Jérémie Bitobe’s story on a biblical plotJoseph (1769): This is a sentimental, lyrical narrative written in rhythmic prose. Later, Fonvizin proudly wrote that this story “served me to draw tears from sensitive people. For I know many who, reading Joseph, which I translated, shed tears.”

In 1769, Fonvizin became one of the secretaries of Chancellor Count N.I. Panin, who was making plans for the early transfer of the throne to Pavel Petrovich and limiting autocracy in favor of the Supreme Council of nobles. Having soon become Panin's confidant, Fonvizin plunged into an atmosphere of political projects and intrigues. In the 1770s, he only twice acted as a writer (more precisely, as a political publicist of the “Panin party”, instructing the monarch on how to rule for the good of the nation) - in A word for Pavel Petrovich's recovery (1771) and translation Words of praise to Marcus Aurelius A.Thoma (1777). Fonvizin’s letters, written during a trip to France in 1777–1778 and addressed to P.I. Panin (the chancellor’s brother), are a remarkable description of the mores of French society on the eve of the revolution in style and satirical sharpness.

After the disgrace and resignation of N.I. Panin, Fonvizin also retired (in March 1782). In 1782–1783, “according to Panin’s thoughts,” he composed Discourse on indispensable state laws (so-called Panin's will ), which was supposed to be a preface to the prepared but unrealized N.I. and P.I. Panin to the project “Fundamental rights that cannot be applied at all times by any authority” (i.e., essentially, the project of a constitutional monarchy in Russia). Later thisPanin's will , replete with attacks against the autocracy, was used for propaganda purposes by the Decembrists. Immediately after the death of the patron (March 1783), Fonvizin composed a brochureLife of Count N.I. Panin , published in St. Petersburg, first in French (1784), and then in Russian (1786).

The comedy brought Fonvizin fame and universal recognition Minor (1779–1781, post. September 1782, pub. 1783). The extraordinary success of the play when it was first staged on the court stage on Tsaritsyn Meadow was testified by the unknown author of the Dramatic Dictionary (1787): “The theater was incomparably filled, and the audience applauded the play by throwing purses.” This is a “comedy of manners”, depicting the domestic life of a wild and dark family of provincial landowners. At the center of the comedy is the image of Mrs. Prostakova, a tyrant and despot in her own family and even more so among her peasants. Her cruelty in dealing with others is compensated by her unreasonable and ardent tenderness for her son Mitrofanushka, who, thanks to such maternal upbringing, grows up spoiled, rude, ignorant and completely unfit for any business. Prostakova is confident that she can do whatever she wants, because a decree on “noble freedom” has been given for this. Opposed to her and her relatives, Starodum, Pravdin, Sophia and Milon believe that the freedom of a nobleman lies in the right to study, and then serve society with his mind and knowledge, which justifies the nobility of the noble title. In the finale, retribution comes: Prostakova is cut off from her estate and abandoned by her own son (the theme of a cruel tyrant, indulging in his passions and destroying his subjects, brings Fonvizin’s comedy closer to tragedies A.P. Sumarokova ). Contemporaries most of all inUnderage Starodum’s prudent monologues captivated him; later, comedy was valued for the colorful, socially characteristic language of the characters and colorful everyday scenes (often these two levels of comedy - ideological and everyday - were contrasted, as, for example, in the epigram I.F. Bogdanovich: The venerable Starodum, / Hearing the vile noise, / Where the woman is unattractive, / With nails crawling into her face, / He quickly went home. / Dear writer, / Sorry, I did the same ).

In 1783, Princess E.R. Dashkova invited Fonvizin to participate in the magazine “Interlocutor of the Russian Word” that she published. His first issue appeared The experience of a Russian estate . Compiled as if for the needs of the “Dictionary of the Russian Academy of Sciences” being prepared, FonvizinskyExperience… was a covert political satire, exposing the court order and the “idleness” of the nobles. In the same magazine in 1783, without a title or signature, Fonvizin’s politically acute and daring “questions” were published (in the manuscript they are titled asSeveral questions that can arouse special attention in intelligent and honest people ), addressed to Catherine II and supplied with “answers” from the empress herself, who at first believed I.I. Shuvalova to be the author of the “questions”. The truth soon became clear, and thus Fonvizin, with his “free speech,” incurred the displeasure of the authorities and subsequently experienced difficulties with the publication of his works. Translation of the work by I.G. ZimmermanAbout national curiosity (1785), a story about the persecution suffered by a sage, truth teller ruler (Callisthenes. Greek story , 1786), and a poetic fableFox-Kaznodey (17887) were published anonymously. By 1788 he had prepared hisComplete works and translations in 5 volumes: a subscription was announced, but publication did not take place, and even its manuscript is now lost. In the same 1788, he unsuccessfully sought permission to publish the author’s magazine “Friend of Honest People, or Starodum” (some of the magazine materials prepared by Fonvizin were published only in 1830).

In recent years, Fonvizin’s health had deteriorated greatly (in 1784–1785 he and his wife traveled to Italy for treatment) and at the same time his religious and repentant sentiments increased. They were reflected in an autobiographical essay written “in the footsteps” Confessions J.-J. Rousseau, – Sincere confession of my deeds and thoughts (1791). His last comedy, incompletely preservedChoosing a tutor (between 1790 and 1792), dedicated, as in many ways,Minor , issues of education, however, it is much inferior to the latter in artistic terms.

Fonvizin died on December 1 (12), 1792 in St. Petersburg after an evening spent visiting G.R. Derzhavin , where, according to the reviews of those present, he was cheerful and playful. He was buried at the Lazarevskoye cemetery of the Alexander Nevsky Lavra.

Vladimir Korovin

Fonvizin was an educator, but the stamp of noble narrow-mindedness marked both his faith in enlightened absolutism and in the primordial selectivity of his class. It should be noted, however, that Fonvizin’s early interest in class, and essentially in social issues, characteristic of his subsequent work, will allow him to more soberly than many of his contemporaries assess the political situation that developed during the reign of Catherine II . Later, creating the image of the nobleman Starodum in “The Minor,” an image to which the author’s thoughts and sympathies are given in this play, he will note that his hero made his fortune and achieved independence as an honest industrialist, and not as a sycophantic courtier. Fonvizin was among the first Russian writers who began to consistently destroy the class barriers of feudal society.

“Corion”, a free adaptation of the comedy by the French playwright J.-B. Gresse "Sydney", opens the St. Petersburg period of Fonvizin's work. The translation of Voltaire's tragedy "Alzira" (which was distributed in copies) created his reputation as a talented aspiring author. At the same time, he was accepted into a circle of young playwrights who grouped around his immediate superior I. P. Elagin, a famous translator and philanthropist. In this circle, the theory of “declining” foreign works “to Russian customs” was developed. Elagin was the first to apply the principle of “declension” in the play “Jean de Molay, or the Russian Frenchman,” borrowed from Golberg, and V. I. Lukin consistently formulated it in the prefaces to his comedies.

Until this time, translated plays depicted life that was incomprehensible to the Russian audience, and foreign names were used. All this, as Lukin wrote, not only destroyed the theatrical illusion, but also reduced the educational impact of the theater. Therefore, the “remaking” of these plays in the Russian style began. With “Korion” Fonvizin declared himself as a supporter of national themes in drama and joined the fight against translators of entertainment plays.

In Elagin’s circle they showed a keen interest in the new genre of “serious comedy,” which received theoretical justification in Diderot’s articles and conquered European stages. An attempt, half-hearted and not entirely successful, to introduce the principles of moralizing dramaturgy into the Russian literary tradition was already made in Lukin’s plays. But his comedies turned out to be devoid of a sense of the comic and, most importantly, resisted the growing penetration of satire into all areas of literature, which a few years later led to the emergence of satirical journalism. Such private themes as a touching depiction of suffering virtue or the correction of a vicious nobleman did not in any way correspond to the political goals of Russian enlighteners, who raised the question of transforming society as a whole. Close attention to human behavior in society allowed Fonvizin to understand more deeply than his contemporaries the foundations of Diderot's educational aesthetics. The idea of a satirical comedy about the Russian nobility took shape in an atmosphere of controversy surrounding the Commission for drawing up the New Code, where the majority of nobles came out in defense of serfdom. In 1769, “The Brigadier” was completed, and, turning to social satire, Fonvizin finally broke with the Elagin circle.

The comedy “The Brigadier” was ultimately a scathing satire on serf owners, although Fonvizin did not directly touch on the topic of serfdom.

In 1872, Fonvizin completed work on the comedy "The Minor"

Outwardly remaining within the confines of an everyday comedy, offering the viewer a number of everyday scenes, Fonvizin in “The Minor” touched on new and deep issues. The task is to show modern “mores” as a result a certain system relationships between people determined the artistic success of “The Minor” and made it a “people’s” comedy, according to Pushkin. Touching upon the main and topical issues, “Nedorosl” was indeed a very vivid, historically accurate picture of Russian life in the 18th century. and as such went beyond the ideas of the narrow circle of the Panins. Fonvizin in “Nedorosl” assessed the main phenomena of Russian life from the point of view of their socio-political meaning. But his idea of the political structure of Russia was formed taking into account the main problems of class society, so that the comedy can be considered the first picture of social types in Russian literature.

In terms of genre, “Minor” is a comedy. The play contains many truly comic and partly farcical scenes, reminiscent of The Brigadier. However, Fonvizin’s laughter in “The Minor” takes on a darkly tragic character, and the farcical brawls, when Prostakova, Mitrofan and Skotinin take part in them, cease to be perceived as traditional funny interludes.

Addressing far from funny problems in comedy, Fonvizin did not so much strive to invent new stage techniques as rethink the old ones. In The Minor, the techniques of bourgeois drama were interpreted in a completely original way in connection with the Russian dramatic tradition. For example, the function of the sounding board of classical drama has changed radically. In “The Minor,” a similar role is played by Starodum, who expresses the author’s point of view; This person is not so much acting as speaking. In translated Western drama there was a similar figure of a wise old nobleman. But his actions and reasoning were limited to the moral realm, most often family problems. Starodum Fonvizin acts as a political speaker, and his moralizations are a form of presentation of a political program. In this sense, he rather resembles the heroes of the Russian tyrant-fighting tragedy. It is possible that the latent influence of the high “drama of ideas” on Fonvizin, the translator of Voltaire’s Alzira, was stronger than it might seem at first glance.

Fonvizin was the creator of social comedy in Russia. His socio-political concept determined the most characteristic and general feature of his dramaturgy - a purely educational opposition between the world of evil and the world of reason, and thus the generally accepted content of everyday satirical comedy received a philosophical interpretation. Bearing in mind this feature of Fonvizin’s plays, Gogol wrote about how the playwright deliberately neglects the content of the intrigue, “seeing through it another, higher content.”

For the first time in Russian drama, the love affair of comedy was completely relegated to the background and acquired an auxiliary meaning.

According to the plot and title, “The Minor” is a play about how badly and incorrectly a young nobleman was taught, raising him as a direct “minor.” In fact, we are not talking about teaching, but about “education” in the broad sense of the word that is usual for Fonvizin.

Although Mitrofan is a minor figure on stage, the fact that the play received the name “Minor” is not accidental. Mitrofan Prostakov is the last of three generations of Skotinins, who pass before the audience directly or in the memories of other characters and demonstrate that during this time nothing has changed in the world of the Prostakovs. The story of Mitrofan’s upbringing explains where the Skotinins come from and what needs to be changed so that they do not appear in the future: to destroy slavery and overcome the “bestial” vices of human nature with moral education.

In "The Minor" not only the positive characters outlined in "The Brigadier" are developed, but also a deeper image of social evil is given. As before, Fonvizin’s focus is on the nobility, but not in itself, but in close ties with the serf class, which it rules, and the supreme power, representing the country as a whole. The events in the Prostakovs' house, quite colorful in themselves, are ideologically an illustration of more serious conflicts.

From the first scene of the comedy, the fitting of a caftan sewn by Trishka, Fonvizin depicts the very kingdom where “people are the property of people,” where “a person of one state can be both a plaintiff and a judge over a person of another state” (2, 265), as he wrote in "Discourse". Prostakova is the sovereign mistress of her estate. Whether her slaves Trishka, Eremeevna or the girl Palashka are right or wrong, this depends only on her arbitrariness, and she says about herself that “she doesn’t give up: she scolds, she fights, and that’s how the house holds together” (1, 124). However, calling Prostakova a “despicable fury,” Fonvizin does not want to emphasize that the tyrant landowner he depicts is an exception to the general rule. His idea was, as M. Gorky accurately noted, “to show the nobility degenerate and corrupted precisely by the slavery of the peasantry.” Skotinin, Prostakova’s brother, the same ordinary landowner, is also “to blame for everything” (1, 109), and the pigs in his villages live much better than people. “Isn’t a nobleman free to beat a servant whenever he wants?” (1, 172) - he supports his sister when she justifies her atrocities by referring to the Decree on the Liberty of the Nobility.

Accustomed to impunity, Prostakova extends her power from the serfs to her husband, Sophia, Skotinin - to everyone from whom she hopes she will not meet resistance. But, autocratically managing her own estate, she herself gradually turned into a slave, devoid of self-esteem, ready to grovel before the strongest, and became a typical representative of the world of lawlessness and tyranny. The idea of the “animal” lowland of this world is carried out in “Nedorosl” as consistently as in “The Brigadier”: both the Skotinins and the Prostakovs are “of the same litter” (1, 135). Prostakova is just one example of how despotism destroys the human being in a person and destroys the social ties of people.

Talking about his life in the capital, Starodum paints the same world of selfishness and slavery, people “without a soul.” Essentially, Starodum-Fonvizin asserts, drawing a parallel between the small landowner Prostakova and the noble nobles of the state, “if an ignoramus without a soul is a beast,” then the “most enlightened clever woman” without her is nothing more than a “pathetic creature” (1, 130). The courtiers, to the same extent as Prostakova, have no idea of duty and honor, subservient to the nobles and push around the weak, crave wealth and rise at the expense of their rival.

Starodum's aphoristic invective touched the entire noble class. There is a legend that some landowner filed a complaint against Fonvizin for Starodum’s remark “she’s a master at interpreting decrees,” feeling personally insulted. As for his monologues, no matter how secret they were, the most topical of them were removed at the request of the censor from the stage text of the play. Fonvizin’s satire in “Nedorosl” was directed against Catherine’s specific policies.

Central in this regard is the first scene of the 5th act of “The Minor,” where, in a conversation between Starodum and Pravdin, Fonvizin sets out the main thoughts of the “Discourse” about the example that the sovereign should set for his subjects and the need for strong laws in the state. Starodum formulates them as follows: “A sovereign worthy of the throne strives to elevate the souls of his subjects... Where he knows what his true glory is..., there everyone will soon feel that everyone must seek their happiness and benefits in the one thing that is legal and that which is oppressed by slavery their own kind is lawless" (1, 167–168). In the pictures drawn by Fonvizin of the abuses of serf owners, in the story he depicted of Mitrofan’s upbringing as a slave Eremeevna, so that “instead of one slave there are two” (1, 169), in the reviews of the favorites standing at the helm of power, where there is no place for honest people, there was an accusation of the very the reigning empress. In a play composed for a public theater, the writer could not express himself as precisely and definitely as he did in the “Discourse on Indispensable State Laws,” intended for a narrow circle of like-minded people. But the reader and viewer understood the inevitable misunderstandings. According to Fonvizin himself, it was the role of Starodum that ensured the success of the comedy; The audience “applauded the performance of this role by I. A. Dmitrevsky by throwing wallets” onto the stage.

The role of Starodum was important for Fonvizin in one more respect. In the scenes with Sophia, Pravdin, Milon, he consistently sets out the views of an “honest man” on family morality, on the duties of a nobleman engaged in the affairs of civil government and military service. The appearance of such an extensive program indicated that in Fonvizin’s work, Russian educational thought moved from criticism of the dark sides of reality to the search for practical ways to change the autocratic system.

Fonvizin's heroes are static. They leave the stage the same way they appeared. The clash between them does not change their characters. However, in the living journalistic fabric of the works, their actions acquired ambiguity that was not characteristic of the dramaturgy of classicism. Already in the image of the Brigadier there are features that could not only make the viewer laugh, but also evoke his sympathy. The foreman is stupid, greedy, evil. But suddenly she turns into an unhappy woman who, with tears, tells the story of Captain Gvozdilova, so similar to her own fate. An even stronger similar stage technique - assessing the character from different points of view - was carried out in the denouement of "The Minor".

The atrocities of the Prostakovs suffer a well-deserved punishment. An order comes from the authorities to take the estate into government custody. However, Fonvizin fills the external rather traditional denouement - vice is punished, virtue triumphs - with deep internal content. The appearance of Pravdin with a decree in his hands resolves the conflict only formally. The viewer knew well that Peter’s decree on guardianship over tyrant landowners was not applied in practice. In addition, he saw that Skotinin, Prostakova’s worthy brother in oppressing the peasants, remained completely unpunished. He is just frightened by the thunderstorm that broke out over the Prostakovs’ house and safely retreats to his village. Fonvizin left the viewer in clear confidence that the Skotinins would only become more careful.

Concludes "Minor" in famous words Starodum: “These are the fruits of evil!” This remark refers not so much to Prostakova’s abdication from landowner power, but to the fact that everyone, even her beloved son, is leaving her, deprived of power. Prostakova's drama is the final illustration of the fate of every person in a world of lawlessness: if you are not a tyrant, then you will find yourself a victim. On the other hand, with the last scene Fonvizin emphasized the moral conflict of the play. A vicious person prepares his own inevitable punishment through his actions.

Fonvizin’s most important achievement, as already noted, was an understanding of character that was new to Russian literature. True, even his entire complexity of character is limited to one or two traits. But the playwright motivates and explains these character traits with biographical circumstances and class affiliation. Pushkin, having read “A Conversation with Princess Khaldina,” a scene from Fonvizin’s unfinished play, admired how vividly the writer was able to portray a person as nature and the Russian “half-education” of the 18th century made him. Later researchers, regardless of whether we are talking about elements of realism in Fonvizin’s work or about his belonging to “enlightenment realism,” noted the literally historical accuracy of his works. Fonvizin was able to paint a reliable picture of the morals of his time, since he was guided not only by the enlightenment idea of human nature, but also realized that a specific character bears the imprint of social and political existence. Showing this connection between man and society, he made his images, conflicts, and plots an expression of social patterns. Demonstrated with the brilliance of talent, this discovery of Fonvizin in practice became one of the basic principles of mature realism.

Part B tasks

Short answer questions

Part C tasks

Description of the presentation by individual slides:

1 slide

Slide description:

2 slide

Slide description:

Magic land! There, in the old days, the brave ruler of Satire, Fonvizin, the friend of freedom, shone... A.S. Pushkin

3 slide

Slide description:

4 slide

Slide description:

Born into a wealthy noble family. From 1755 to 1760 he studied at the gymnasium at Moscow University, and in 1761-1762 - at the Faculty of Philosophy of the same university. IN student years did translations. In 1762, Fonvizin became a translator at the College of Foreign Affairs and moved to St. Petersburg.

5 slide

Slide description:

A nobleman by birth, Fonvizin entered the gymnasium that had just opened at Moscow University at the age of ten. In 1760, among the ten best students, he was taken to St. Petersburg to meet with the founder of the university, M.V. Lomonosov. A student in the philosophy department, Fonvizin established himself by translating from Latin, French and German. Excellent knowledge foreign languages brought him to serve in the College of Foreign Affairs. In St. Petersburg he became close to the outstanding writers of his time - Derzhavin, Kheraskov, Knyazhnin...

6 slide

Slide description:

Fonvizin's literary activity began in the 60s of the 18th century. An inquisitive and witty person, he was created to become a satirist. And there were enough reasons for bitter laughter in the Russian reality of that time. Fonvizin saw that embezzlers, bribe-takers, careerists gathered around the throne of Catherine II, that the waves peasant uprisings- these are ominous signs of an impending popular storm.

Slide 7

Slide description:

As a result of communication with a circle of young freethinking officers, he created “Message to My Servants...” (1769) - a satirical work based on the traditions of Russian fables and satire. At the same time, the writer showed interest in drama, and he conceived the idea of an original Russian satirical comedy. The first example of this kind was his “Brigadier” (1766-1769).

8 slide

Slide description:

Drama as one of the genders fiction differs significantly from lyrics and epic primarily in that it is intended for performance on stage. Its content consists of speeches, conversations of characters in the form of dialogue (conversation between two or more characters) and monologue (speech, story, expression of thoughts and feelings in the first person). The speech of the characters is accompanied by remarks - the author's instructions about the situation of the action, about internal state characters, their facial expressions and gestures.

Slide 9

Slide description:

The main types of dramatic works are tragedy, drama, comedy. In comedy, certain sides are ridiculed public life, negative traits and properties of people's characters. Satire (from Latin sature - mixture, mishmash) - a type of comic that most mercilessly ridicules human imperfection sharply condemning through ridicule human vices or the imperfection of human life

10 slide

Slide description:

In his most significant work - the comedy "The Minor" (1781) - Fonvizin points to the root of all Russia's troubles - serfdom. The author evaluates and judges not human vices in themselves, but first of all social relations. Positive heroes- enlightened nobles - not only condemn serfdom, but fight against it. The comedy is based on the acute social conflict. Life in the Prostakovs' house is presented not as a summary picture of absurd customs, but as a system of relations based on serfdom.

11 slide

Slide description:

The author creates multifaceted characters, revealing the inner drama of such negative characters as Eremeevna and Prostakova. According to N.V. Gogol, “The Minor” is “...truly social comedy" In 1782, Fonvizin resigned and was engaged only in literary activities. In 1783 he published a number of satirical works. The empress herself answered them with irritation.

12 slide

Slide description:

Last years During his life, Fonvizin was seriously ill (paralysis), but continued to write until his death. In 1789 he began work on autobiographical story“A sincere confession of my deeds and thoughts,” but did not finish this work. The story is a wonderful work of Russian prose. Here, in the image of the author, the character of a person and writer is recreated - Russian in mentality, humor, irony, the spiritual wealth of a personality is shown, who knows how to rise above his weaknesses and fearlessly tell his compatriots about them.

Fonvizin Denis Ivanovich (1745 1792) - one of the most educated people of his era. He was a writer and playwright, publicist and translator. He is rightfully considered the creator of the national Russian everyday comedy, the most famous of which are “The Minor” and “The Brigadier”. Born on April 14, 1745 in Moscow, into a noble family of descendants of a knight of the Livonian Order. Even under Ivan the Terrible, one of the knights of the Von Wiesen Order was captured and remained in the service of the Russian Tsar. From him came the Fonvizin family (the prefix von was added in the Russian manner to the surname Wizen). Thanks to his father, he received his primary education at home. He was brought up in the patriarchal structure that reigned in the family. From 1755 he studied at the noble gymnasium at Moscow University, then at the Faculty of Philosophy of the same university.

Since 1762 he has been in the public service, first working as a translator, then, from 1763, in the Collegium of Foreign Affairs as secretary of the cabinet minister Elagin. After working here for about six years, in 1769 he became the personal secretary of Count Panin. From 1777 to 1778 travels abroad, spending a lot of time in France. In 1779 he returned to Russia and entered service as an adviser to the chancellery of the Secret Expedition. In 1783, his patron Count Panin passed away and he immediately resigned with the rank of state councilor and 3,000 rubles. annual pension. He devoted his free time to travel.

Since 1783, Denis Ivanovich visited Western Europe, Germany, Austria, and spent a lot of time in Italy. In 1785, the writer suffered his first stroke, due to which he had to return to Russia in 1787. Despite the paralysis that tormented him, he continued to engage in literary work.
Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin passed away on December 1 (12), 1792. The writer was buried in St. Petersburg at the Lazarevskoye cemetery of the Alexander Nevsky Lavra.

Creative path

The creation of the first works dates back to the 1760s. Being by nature a lively and witty person who loved to laugh and joke, he created his early works in the genre of satire. This was facilitated by his gift of irony, which did not leave him until the end of his life. During these years, intensive work has been going on in the literary field. In 1760, in “Literary Heritage” he published his so-called “early “Minor””. At the same time, in the period from 1761 to 1762, he was engaged in translations of Holberg's fables, works of Rousseau, Ovid, Gresse, Terrason and Voltaire.

In 1766, his first well-known satirical comedy, “The Brigadier,” was completed. The play became an event in literary circles, the author himself read it masterfully and Fonvizin, then still little known, was invited to Peterhof to read his work to Empress Catherine II herself. It was a huge success. The play was staged on theater stage in 1770, but was published only after the death of the author. The comedy has not left the theater stage to this day. A legend has reached us that after the premiere, Prince Potemkin said to Fonvizin: “Die, Denis! But you can’t write better!” In the same year, a translation of the treatise “The Trading Nobility, Contrasted with the Military Nobility” was published, which presented evidence of the need for the nobility to engage in trade.

Mature creativity

Among the journalistic works, “Discourse on the Indispensable Laws of State,” created in 1783, is considered one of the best. In the autumn of the same 1783, the premiere of the main play in Fonvizin’s work, the comedy “The Minor,” took place. Despite the extensive literary heritage, left by Fonvizin, for most of us his name is associated with this comedy. The first production of the play was not easy. The censors were embarrassed by the satirical nature of the play and the boldness of the remarks of some of the comedy characters. Finally, on September 24, 1782, the production was carried out on the stage of Volny Russian Theater. The success was colossal. As one of the authors of the “Dramatic Dictionary” testified: “The theater was incomparably filled and the audience applauded the play by throwing purses.” The next production took place in Moscow on May 14, 1783 at the Medox Theater. Since that time, for more than 250 years, the play has been performed with constant success in all theaters in Russia. With the birth of cinema, the first film adaptation of the comedy appeared. In 1926, based on “The Minor,” Grigory Roshal made the film “The Skotinins’ Gentlemen.”

It is difficult to overestimate the influence of Fonvizin’s “Minor” on subsequent generations of writers. His works were read and studied by all subsequent generations of writers from Pushkin, Lermontov, Gogol, Belinsky to the present day. However, in the life of the writer himself, she played a fatal role. Catherine the Second perfectly understood the freedom-loving orientation of comedy as an attempt on existing social and state foundations. After 1783, when a number of the writer's satirical works were published, she personally prohibited further publication of his works in print. And this continued until the death of the writer.

However, despite publication bans, Denis Ivanovich continues to write. During this period, the comedy “The Governor’s Choice” and the feuilleton “Conversation with Princess Khaldina” were written. Just before his departure, Fonvizin wanted to publish a five-volume set of his works, but was refused by the empress. Of course, it was published, but much later after the master left.

The remarkable Russian playwright Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin (1744/45-1792), author of the comedies “Brigadier” and “Minor”, his creative path started out as a poet. He was born into a Russified German family that had long since taken root in Moscow. His father, an educated free-thinking man, carried throughout his life lofty concepts about the honor, dignity and social duty of a nobleman. Fonvizin, by his own admission, “copied” the old man from the comedy “The Minor” from his father. Decency and independence of judgment were the main qualities that the head of the family cultivated in his sons. Denis's younger brother Pavel, who later left a good mark as the director of Moscow University, also wrote poetry. But the brothers' poems were different. Pavel Ivanovich was attracted to elegiac poetry. Denis Ivanovich, distinguished by a mocking mindset, practiced parodies, satirical messages and fables.

After graduating from the gymnasium at Moscow University, both brothers became students of this university. Denis Ivanovich receives a philological and philosophical education and, upon completion of the course, is assigned to serve in St. Petersburg at the College of Foreign Affairs. Here he worked since 1762 as a translator, and then as a secretary for a major political figure of that time, N.I. Panin, sharing his opposition views towards Catherine II, and on his instructions developed draft constitutional reforms in Russia, which were supposed to abolish serfdom, rid the country of the power of temporary workers, and provide political rights to all classes.

Very early, the young man showed the qualities that his father fostered in him: courage of judgment and independence of behavior. It is no coincidence that, in addition to famous comedies, he left to his descendants sharp political pamphlets and boldly and brilliantly written journalistic articles. He translated Voltaire's tragedy "Alzira", filled with daring attacks against the ruling power, into Russian.

Fonvizin’s most daring journalistic work was the so-called “Testament of N.I. Panin" (1783). An opposition-minded nobleman, to whose party Fonvizin belonged, shortly before his death asked the writer to draw up a political will for him. This was supposed to be a pamphlet addressed to the heir to the throne, Paul, and directed against the order established in Russia by his mother Catherine II. Fonvizin carried out the assignment brilliantly. Three decades will pass, and the formidable indictment document, written with a masterful hand, will be adopted by the Decembrists, creating secret political societies.

Having clarified Fonvizin’s ideological position, let us turn to the analysis of two of his poetic works, which were distributed due to their daring content in lists and published only much later. Both of them were created in the early 1760s, when Fonvizin had already moved to St. Petersburg and served in the College of Foreign Affairs. Both have a strong satirical bent. One of them is the fable “Fox-Koznodey”, the second is “Message to my servants Shumilov, Vanka and Petrushka”.

In the Libyan side a true rumor rushed,

That Leo, the king of the beasts, died in the big forest,

Cattle flocked there from all directions

Witness a huge funeral.

Fox-Koznodey, during this gloomy ritual,

With a humble charea, in monastic attire,

Climbing up onto the pulpit, he cries out with delight:

“Oh rock! the fiercest rock! Who has the world lost?

Struck by the death of the meek ruler,

Weep and wail, venerable cathedral of beasts!

Behold the king, the wisest of all forest kings,

Worthy of eternal tears, worthy of altars,

Father to his slaves, terrible to his enemies,

Prostrate before us, insensitive and voiceless!

Whose mind could comprehend the number of his kindnesses?

The abyss of goodness, the greatness of generosity?

During his reign, innocence did not suffer

And truth fearlessly presided at the trial;

He nourished bestiality in his soul,

In it he respected the support of his throne;

There was a planter of order in his area,

He was a friend and patron of the arts and sciences.”

In addition to the Fox, there are two more characters in the fable: the Mole and the Dog. These are much more frank and honest in their assessments of the late king. However, they won’t tell the truth out loud; They whisper in each other's ears.

Let us recall the dialogue between Starodum and Pravdin from the third act of Fonvizin’s comedy “The Minor” (1781). Starodum talks about the vile morals and orders that reign at court. An honest and decent person, he could not accept them or adapt to them. Pravdin is amazed: “With your rules, people should not be released from the court, but they must be called to the court.” "What for? “- Starodum is perplexed. “Then why do they call a doctor to a sick person,” Pravdin gets excited. Starodum cools his ardor with a reasonable remark: “My friend, you are mistaken. It is in vain to call a doctor to the sick without healing. The doctor won’t help here unless he gets infected himself.” Isn't it true that the ending of the fable resembles the quoted dialogue? The fable and the comedy were separated by a time period of almost twenty years. The thoughts expressed by the young poet Fonvizin will find development and completion in a different artistic form: dramatic, brought to the wide public stage.

The date of creation of another wonderful poetic work by Fonvizin, “Messages to my servants Shumilov, Vanka and Petrushka,” has not been precisely established. Most likely it was written between 1762 and 1763. No less daring in content than “Fox-Koznodey,” “Message” also reached readers without the name of the author, in handwritten copies. From the very first lines, the poem states a seemingly somewhat abstract, philosophical problem: why the “white light” was created and what place is assigned to man in it. However, for clarification, the author, who is also one of the heroes of the “Message,” turns not to learned men, but to his servants. To the middle-aged “uncle” (that is, the servant assigned to the master to “look after” him) Shumilov, who had already turned gray. The coachman Vanka, apparently, is a middle-aged man who has already seen a lot in his life. And Petrushka, the youngest and therefore the most frivolous of the trio of servants.

The judgments of the coachman Vanka are the central and most important part of the poem. Having chosen the conductor of your ideas common man from the people, Fonvizin gives a sharp description of the order in the country. No church dogmas, no government regulations will explain or justify the social structure in which the system of universal hypocrisy, deception and theft triumphs:

The priests are trying to deceive the people,

Servants are the butler, butlers are the masters,

Each other are gentlemen, and noble boyars

Often they want to deceive the sovereign;

And everyone, in order to fill his pocket tighter,

For the sake of good, he decided to engage in deception.

Before money, the townsmen's delicacies, the nobles,

Judges, clerks, soldiers and peasants.

Humble are the shepherds of our souls and hearts

They deign to collect rent from their sheep.

Sheep marry, breed, die,

And the shepherds line their pockets,

For pure money they forgive every sin,

Money promises a lot of pleasures in paradise.

But if you can tell the truth in the world,

I will tell you my opinion truthfully:

For the money of the Most High Creator

Both the shepherd and the sheep are ready to deceive!

From the unpretentious story picture(three servants seem to be discussing an abstract topic) a large-scale picture of the life of Russian society emerges. It captures the life and morality of common people, church ministers, and “great gentlemen.” It includes the Creator himself in its orbit! The “Message” was a bold and risky challenge to both the politics and ideology of the ruling circles. That’s why it couldn’t have been published in those days; it was circulated in handwritten lists. “The light here” lives in untruth - this is the final conclusion of the work.

In 1769, twenty-four-year-old Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin (1745-1792) wrote the comedy “The Brigadier”. This is a cruel satire on young people who visited France, on the servile attitude towards them in Russia, on the disdain for everything domestic. Fonvizin himself, having been abroad several times, including in France, met European countries, but was not fascinated by them. The comedy “The Brigadier” did not have a stage adaptation for a long time, but was read by the author many times among friends and acquaintances. Listeners, and later spectators, enthusiastically accepted the comedy for its striking similarity, faithfulness of characters and typical images.

In 1782, Fonvizin wrote the comedy “The Minor.” The first production took place on September 24, 1782.V.O. Klyuchevsky called “Nedorosl” an “incomparable mirror” of Russian reality. Exposing the lordly tyranny, Fonvizin showed the corrupting effect of serfdom, which disfigured both peasants and landowners. The problem of educating the nobility, raised in “Brigadier,” received a social resonance in “Nedorosl.” Fonvizin adhered to the educational program moral education citizen and patriot, true son of the Fatherland.

In 1782 Fonvizin retired. Despite his serious illness, he continued to study literary creativity. He wrote “The Experience of a Russian Dictionary” (1783), “Several Questions That Can Arouse Particular Attention in Intelligent and Honest People” (1783), which actually contained criticism of the internal policies of Catherine II, which aroused the dissatisfaction of the Empress. Of great interest are his autobiographical notes “A sincere confession in my deeds and thoughts,” as well as Fonvizin’s extensive epistolary heritage.

Creativity of D.I.Fonvizin

1. Biography and personality of the writer.

2. The beginning of a creative journey. Translations and original works.

3. The comedy “Nedorosl” is the pinnacle of Russian drama of the 18th century. Genre, issues, plot and conflict, features of composition, language and style. The problem of the creative method.

4. Fonvizin – publicist.

5. Master class “Genres and forms of youth culture in working with the classical heritage (based on the play “The Minor”)”

Literature

Fonvizin D.I. Collection Works: In 2 vols. M., L., 1959

Pigarev K.V. Creativity of Fonvizin. M., 1954.

Makogonenko G.P. From Fonvizin to Pushkin. M., 1969. pp. 336-367.

Berkov P.N. History of Russian comedy of the 18th century. L., 1977.

History of Russian drama: XVII - first half of the XIX century. L., 1982.

Moiseeva G.N. Ways of development of Russian drama of the 18th century. M., 1986.

Strichek A. Denis Fonvizin: Russia of the Enlightenment. M., 1994.

Lebedeva O.B. Russian high comedy of the 18th century: Genesis and poetics of the genre. Tomsk, 1996. Ch. 1 (§ 5), 2 (§ 2, 3), 4, 5 (§ 4).

1. Denis Ivanovich Fonvizin is one of the remarkable representatives of the century, who shared with him its ups and downs, hopes and disappointments.

On the one hand, he is a secular man who has made an excellent career (personal secretary of I. Elagin and N. Panin, after Panin’s resignation, he headed the postal department), quite rich, one of the first in Russia to begin to deal with the acquisition of art objects abroad, on the other hand - “The Satires of the Brave Lord” and “Friend of Freedom”, the author of “The Minor”, “Court Grammar”, who compiled the famous “Testament of Panin” (certain provisions of this document were used by the Decembrists in their political platforms), a man who was suspected of conspiracy against Catherine.

The personality is lively and captivating. A.S. Pushkin wrote about him:

It was a famous writer,

Famous Russian merry fellow,

The mocker with his laurels

Denis, the ignorant are scourged and afraid.

He was an unusually witty person. From memoirs: “Very early, a penchant for satire appeared in me... my sharp words rushed around Moscow, and as they were caustic for many, the offended declared me to be an evil and dangerous boy. … They soon began to fear me, then hate me.” Fonvizin had the gift of a parodist and also had undoubted artistic abilities. In a home performance in the Apraksins’ house, he played the role of Taras Skotinin (!). From the memoirs of contemporaries (about reading the comedy “The Brigadier” in the Hermitage for Catherine and her entourage): “... showed his talent in all its brilliance. ... he depicted the most noble nobles in their faces, engaged in an argument while playing whist, so skillfully, as if they themselves were here.”

Coming from a German aristocratic family (which had become fairly Russified by the 18th century), received a good education, and was an expert in European languages, Fonvizin, in the words of A.S. Pushkin, was “from the Per-Russian Russians.” From the writer’s letter: “If any of my young fellow citizens who have a sound mind become indignant, seeing abuses and disorder in Russia, and begin to alienate themselves from it in their hearts, then to convert to proper love for the fatherland there is no better way than to send him as soon as possible.” To France. Here, of course, he will learn very soon by experience that all the stories about local perfection are a complete lie, that a truly intelligent and worthy person is rare everywhere, and that in our fatherland, no matter how bad things sometimes happen in it, you can, however, be just as much as happy as in any other country.” Looking ahead a little, I would like to note the following. In 1785, he translated Zimmermann’s book “Discourse on National Curiosity” into Russian. In this translation, he expressed and at the same time deepened his understanding of the essence and nature of patriotism - “love of the fatherland, civic virtue, which is associated with love of freedom.”

2.Early work of D.I. Fonvizin associated with the ideas of the French and German enlightenment. Thus, he translated into Russian the Moral Fables of the Danish Enlightenment and Satirist L. Golberg, the novel Heroic Virtue, or the Life of Seth, King of Egypt by J. Terrason, and the anticlerical drama Alzira by Voltaire.

He also wrote satires. One of them has reached our time: “Message to my servants, Shumilov, Vanka and Petrushka” (1760).

His next important period literary activity associated with I.P. Elagin’s circle. The circle, along with Fonvizin (then still von Vizin), included talented representatives of the golden youth of St. Petersburg: Vladimir Lukin, Fyodor Kozlovsky, Bogdan Elchaninov. They began to “inflect the texts of foreign plays into Russian morals”: they moved the scene of action to Russia, gave the characters Russian names, and introduced some features of Russian life. This is how the well-known comedies of the 18th century by I. Elagin “The Russian Frenchman” (an adaptation of Golberg’s play), Vl. Lukin’s “Mot Corrected by Love” (an adaptation of a play by Detouche), and D. Fonvizin’s “Corion” (an adaptation of a play by Gresse) appeared.

2. Original comedy creativity of D.I. Fonvizin connected with the history of the creation and production of his famous plays “The Brigadier” and “The Minor.” Fonvizin worked on the comedy “The Brigadier” in 1768-1769. According to contemporaries: “This is the first comedy in our morals.” Its themes: 1) education of nobles; 2) extortion and bribery; 3) the emergence of new people. The genre of “Brigadier” is comedy of manners with elements of slapstick comedy. For the first time in the history of Russian comedy, it presents such techniques as 1) travesty of the structure of bourgeois drama (respectable fathers of families embark on love affairs) 2) the technique of self-exposure of the character; 3) verbal techniques of the comic (use of macaroonisms, puns).

3. The comedy “The Minor” is the pinnacle of the playwright’s creativity. He worked on it starting in the 1770s. Its premiere took place on September 24, 1782 in St. Petersburg on the Field of Mars. The most famous Russian actors took part in the production: Dmitrevsky, Plavilshchikov, Mikhailova, Shumsky.

Ivan Dmitrevsky, who played Starodum, chose the play for his benefit performance. At this time, he returned from a brilliant tour of Europe, thanks to which, in fact, the production of “The Minor” became possible; Catherine was afraid of publicity. Subsequently, the play was removed from the repertoire, but its premieres still took place in a number of provincial theaters. The play was a stunning success; it was celebrated by throwing purses onto the stage. G. Potemkin is credited with the famous phrase: “Die Denis or don’t write anything else, your name is known from this one play!”

Comedy genre research literature is not defined unambiguously: it is called popular, political, and high.

The problems are also multifaceted: 1) the hidden anti-Catherine orientation is palpable in it: “the edge of political satire was directed against the main social evil of the era - the complete lack of control of the highest authorities, which gave rise to moral devastation and arbitrariness” (P.N. Berkov). Interesting materials, in our opinion, confirming this point of view are available in the book by Yu.V. Stennik “Russian satire of the 18th century. L., 1985, pp. 316-337). In particular, this is an analysis undertaken by the scientist of the plays of the empress herself, the scene of trying on a caftan in the first act of Fonvizin’s play, a comparison of the dialogues of Starodum and Pravdin in the third act of the comedy with Fonvizin’s text “Discourses on the indispensable state laws” 2) the problem of the true dignity of a nobleman; 3) education in the broad sense of the word.

The comedy is masterfully constructed. Three levels of structure are noteworthy: 1) plot; 2) comedic-satirical, 3) ideal-utopian. Basic compositional technique- contrast. The climax can be considered a kind of examination of Mitrofan in the fourth act of the play.

At the same time, each level of the structure has its own stylistic dominant: compositional-satirical - superbly written morally descriptive satire; ideal-utopian - the dialogue manner of philosophical treatises (for more details, see: Stennik Yu.V. Op. cit.).

The question of similarities and differences between this comedy and classic comedy Western Europe. As a rule, such comedies did not allow 1) mixing of the serious and the comic; 2) the images-characters became carriers of one character property; 3) consisted of five acts, with the climax necessarily occurring in the third act; 4) demonstrated the rules of three unities; 5) comedies were written in free verse.

On this basis, the following classicistic features can be identified in Fonvizin’s comedy:

1) it also demonstrated the author’s rationalistic interpretation of reality (low reality was displayed in a low genre);

2) her images became bearers of certain advantages and disadvantages, which was secured by the presence of meaningful/speaking surnames/nicknames;

3) consisted of five actions;

4) demonstrated the rule of three unities.

There were also serious differences. They can be boiled down to the following points:

1) there was a mixture of the serious and the comic in it;

2) a description of everyday life has been introduced;

3) there was some individualization of the characters and their linguistic manner;

4) the climax is attributed to the fourth act;

5) the comedy is written in prose.

We will clarify all these points in detail during the practical lesson.

In the 80s, D.I. Fonvizin became the author of remarkable publications in the “Interlocutor of Lovers of the Russian Word” (“Several questions that can arouse special attention in smart and honest people”, “The Experience of a Russian Estatesman”, “A Petition to the Russian Minerva from Russian writers, “The Narrative of the Imaginary Deaf and Mute”); participated in the compilation of the “Dictionary of the Russian Language” (he compiled dictionary entries for the letters “K” and “L”); translated Zimmerman’s book “Discourses on National Curiosity”, Schubart’s fable “The Fox the Executor”, wrote the story “Callisthenes”, attempted to publish a new magazine “Friend of Honest People, or Starodum” and even prepared several original materials for it, unfortunately, the magazine was banned by censorship; compiled “Court Grammar”, spoke in the genre of confession (“Frank confession of my deeds and actions”), two out of four books were completed.

On November 30, at the Derzhavins’ house, already seriously ill, the writer read his new play “The Tutor’s Choice.” And on December 1, 1792 he was gone.